Litigation public
[search 0]
Mai Mult
Download the App!
show episodes
 
Hosted by litigation attorney Maxwell Goss, the Litigation War Room offers insight and inspiration for courtroom lawyers. Featuring interviews from leading litigators in every area of law, the podcast provides strategies, resources, and war stories.
  continue reading
 
Artwork

1
Litigation Nation

Amundsen Davis, LLC

icon
Unsubscribe
icon
icon
Unsubscribe
icon
Lunar
 
The Litigation Nation Podcast, hosted by Jack Sanker & Danessa Watkins, is a roundup of the most important and interesting legal developments happening right now, giving you an insider’s view to the legal system. If you haven't already, be sure to subscribe to Litigation Nation wherever you listen to podcasts, so you never miss an episode.
  continue reading
 
Artwork

1
Litigation Radio

Legal Talk Network

icon
Unsubscribe
icon
icon
Unsubscribe
icon
Lunar
 
Hosted by Michal Rogson and Jim Reeder, this show features conversations with top litigators, judges, and experts to help litigators develop their careers, win more cases, earn more clients, and build sustainable practices. Stay tuned for the tips segment in every episode with Lauren Williams and ABA Litigation Section’s Mental Health & Wellness Committee! Brought to you by the American Bar Association Litigation Section
  continue reading
 
The Litigation Psychology Podcast presented by Courtroom Sciences, Inc. (CSI) is a podcast for in-house and outside defense counsel and insurance claims personnel about the intersection of science and litigation. We explore topics of interest to the defense bar, with a particular emphasis on subjects that don‘t get enough attention. Our hosts are experts in Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, and scientifically-based jury research with a wealth of knowledge about psychology, science, jur ...
  continue reading
 
Litigation and Capital with Steven Mirsky, partner at Mirsky Corporate Advisors, breaks down high-stakes legal issues affecting companies earning $10-100 million annually. The show aims to help business owners turn complexity into leverage and protect their assets through expert legal insights and practical advice.
  continue reading
 
Artwork

1
Speaking of Litigation Podcast

Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.

icon
Unsubscribe
icon
icon
Unsubscribe
icon
Lunar
 
No business likes litigation. Lawsuits and trials can be stressful, unpredictable, and often confounding—even for battle-scarred business leaders. But they're something almost every business must confront. Speaking of Litigation® pulls back the curtain for an inside look at the various stages of litigation and the key strategic issues businesses face along the way. Knowledge is power, and this show empowers executives and in-house counsel to make better decisions before, during, and after di ...
  continue reading
 
Artwork
 
We are excited to announce the launch of Blackstone Chambers’ The Litigation Podcast. This podcast will examine trends and emerging areas of disputes across the full spectrum of Blackstone’s areas of expertise, including commercial, employment and public/regulatory law.
  continue reading
 
Rivero Mestre’s lawyers are game changers in the practice of business litigation at the highest level. Our legal team combines litigation experience from top-tier firms with multicultural depth, making them especially effective in cross-border disputes and global litigation. In each episode of The Litigation Room, we will discuss legal insights, pressing business developments, and practical considerations about how to approach complex litigation problems.
  continue reading
 
Artwork

1
Pilgrimation Litigation Nation

pilgrimationlitigationnation

icon
Unsubscribe
icon
icon
Unsubscribe
icon
Lunar
 
​​Welcome to Pilgrimation Litigation Nation, hosted by Matt Sky, where attorney Daniel Hutton shares his expertise in personal injury, auto accident law, criminal law, animal bite law, and civil rights. Based in Stoughton, MA, Daniel offers practical legal insights for those navigating the complexities of the legal system.
  continue reading
 
Butler is a civil litigation firm. We are unique because our practice is devoted entirely to defense and insurance litigation. At Butler, our goal is to stay on top of the latest alerts, trends and news so that we can provide you with the most up to date information possible. Stay tuned in for more Butler Podcasts coming soon.
  continue reading
 
The Litigation Quality Patents® Podcast, hosted by Craige Thompson (a.k.a., "The Examiner Whisperer") contains substantive discussion designed to keep you current with what's going on in the world of patents, encompassing everything from patent prosecution and re-examination to patent licensing and litigation.
  continue reading
 
Artwork

1
The Litigation Funding Podcast

The Litigation Funding Podcast

icon
Unsubscribe
icon
icon
Unsubscribe
icon
Zilnic+
 
The litigation funding podcast covers all aspects of litigation finance. We speak with the industry experts to bring you the latest industry information. Interviews with those who have helped form the industry and who are currently working within the industry.
  continue reading
 
The Patent Litigation Podcast by Erick Robinson explores into the intricate world of patent disputes, bringing together expert insights on legal strategies, landmark cases, and industry trends. Here we interview seasoned litigators, judges, and technical experts who share practical wisdom on every phase of patent litigation. From pre-filing considerations to post-trial remedies, we deliver valuable perspectives for attorneys, in-house counsel, inventors, and business leaders.
  continue reading
 
Stephenson Harwood's aviation litigation and regulation team is recognised for its longstanding and extensive experience in advising clients from across the aviation industry, including airlines, lessors, financiers and the major transportation banks, MROs and ground handlers. The team has launched this podcast series to discuss key topical issues in the aviation sector, and to share their insight on how to tackle them.
  continue reading
 
About the Series Charter: A Course is a podcast created by the David Asper Centre for Constitutional Rights (the Asper Centre) and hosted by the Asper Centre’s Executive Director Cheryl Milne. Charter: A Course focuses on Canadian constitutional law and litigation. In each episode, we highlight the accomplishments of U of T Law’s faculty and alumni involved in leading constitutional cases and issues. Each episode also includes a “Practice Corner,” where we talk about the ins and outs of what ...
  continue reading
 
What is the BLIP Podcast? The world of business, law, and intellectual property can be confusing, intimidating, and challenging. BLIPP is a weekly podcast created by Tingen Law where attorneys interview guests, discuss related topics, review court cases, and answer common questions. Who is the BLIP Podcast for? Looking for ways to improve and grow your business? Want to learn more about copyright and trademark law? Maybe you want to listen to interviews with various experts and expand your k ...
  continue reading
 
Loading …
show series
 
On this episode, Maxwell Goss interviews tax attorneys Venar Ayar and Wendy Begress of Ayar Law. They share fascinating case stories, including an IRS settlement for a mere $13 and a $300,000 tax bill that was transformed into a $250,000 refund. Max and his guests talk about strategies for dealing with IRS disputes for businesses and individuals, c…
  continue reading
 
In this episode of Litigation Nation, co-hosts Danessa Watkins and Jack Sanker dive into two significant legal topics currently shaping the landscape of litigation in the U.S. Jack discusses the Trump administration's reversal of affirmative action programs, diving into the history of affirmative action and DEI programs in the U.S and breaking down…
  continue reading
 
Episode Summary: In this episode of *Litigation and Capital*, Steven Mirsky, founder of Mirsky Corporate Advisors, delves into the step-by-step process of civil litigation against companies. From the initial filing to case resolution, Steven explains the key documents involved, court jurisdiction requirements, procedural options for defendants, and…
  continue reading
 
Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. and Steve Wood, Ph.D. answer another batch of podcast viewer and listener questions: • When is the right time to conduct a focus group—should I wait until discovery is complete? • Can I test my opening statement in front of staff members or family? • Why is it important to test opening statements with mock jurors? • Should …
  continue reading
 
Episode Summary: In this episode of *Litigation in Capital*Steven Mirsky delves into the significance of governing law clauses in contracts. He explains how these clauses determine the applicable law for contractual disputes and why they are crucial for businesses engaging in transactions across different jurisdictions. Key Timestamps: 00:00 – Intr…
  continue reading
 
Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. breaks down why the single most powerful testimony tool in depositions and trial is the disciplined use of “No” or “I disagree”, followed by silence. Bill explains how witnesses get into trouble when they add explanations after a comma (“No, because…”), which leads to defensive or evasive answers and creates damaging credib…
  continue reading
 
In this episode, we discuss the topic every litigator must deal with at some point: effective business development strategies. Guests Maureen Cruz, Ph.D., and Tracey Salmon-Smith, both with the firm of Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, share tips for new business development. Waiting for the phone to ring and a client to drop into your lap isn’t a…
  continue reading
 
Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. expands on the “disruptive voir dire” approach, focusing on how to neutralize juror confirmation bias, which is one of the most dangerous psychological forces in the courtroom, and in life. Bill explains why all humans are hardwired to make rapid, belief-driven judgments and how those cognitive shortcuts can lock jurors int…
  continue reading
 
Have you ever thought about writing the perfect legal brief? Guest David N. Greenwald has, so much so that the retired Cravath, Swaine & Moore partner wrote a book on the subject: Sentence, Paragraph, Argument, Brief: Meeting the Four Challenges of Legal Writing. The book is the culmination of a 30-year legal career, beginning with a clerkship and …
  continue reading
 
In this episode, Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. explains why most defense teams misuse jury research by relying solely on a single mock trial and skipping the exploratory phase required by the scientific method for validity and reliability. Bill breaks down how early focus groups are critical in revealing juror confusion, hidden vulnerabilities in your c…
  continue reading
 
Steve Wood, Ph.D. and Linda Khzam, M.A. break down the topic of hindsight bias and its impact on juror decision-making. They explain how learning an outcome makes jurors believe it was predictable all along, leading to exaggerated foreseeability and unrealistic expectations of what defendants “should have known.” Steve and Linda discuss how hindsig…
  continue reading
 
This Veterans Day, Speaking of Litigation brings you a special episode featuring Epstein Becker Green attorneys Stuart Gerson, Jack Fernandez, Ron Green, and Ken Kelly, who share their unique journeys from military service to impactful legal careers. Hear their remarkable stories: Stuart's counterintelligence work in the Air Force during the Vietna…
  continue reading
 
Episode Summary In this episode of Litigation and Capital, Steven Mirsky, partner at Mirsky Corporate Advisors, breaks down how companies can strategically approach litigation readiness to protect what they’ve built. He explains why certain disputes can be resolved before cases even reach court, the credibility factors behind demand letters, and ho…
  continue reading
 
Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. discusses a recurring problem in wrongful death cases: jurors’ tendency to mistakenly believe their job is to assign a monetary value to a life. Bill explains how this cognitive shortcut often leads to inflated damage awards because jurors default to emotional reasoning rather than following the legal instructions. To preve…
  continue reading
 
In this episode of Litigation Nation, co-hosts Danessa Watkins and Jack Sanker dive into two significant legal topics that are currently shaping the landscape of litigation in the United States. Danessa opens with an update on Drake's defamation and harassment lawsuit against his record label, UMG, for its promotion of Kendrick Lamar's "Not Like Us…
  continue reading
 
This is a fun one. As we know, Litigation Radio said goodbye to longtime host Dave Scriven-Young this summer. But what do we know about our new hosts, Michal “Mic” Rogson and James “Jim” Reeder? Believe it or not, they didn’t know each other well before agreeing to cohost the show. That’s a surprise. But they knew “of” each other professionally thr…
  continue reading
 
Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. talks about several issues he sees with opening statements. Bill highlights the biggest issue the CSI team comes across in opening statements: starting the opening statement in the wrong spot. Bill emphasizes the importance of the first two minutes of the opening and how those first two minutes frame how you want the jury t…
  continue reading
 
Tune in to episode 30 of The Litigation Podcast: The Impact of AI: Are Existing Laws Enough? AI-powered automated systems are rapidly reshaping decision-making across sectors. In this episode, the panel examines whether current legal frameworks are sufficiently robust and adaptable to meet the challenges this poses. The discussion addresses two cor…
  continue reading
 
Episode Summary: In this episode of Litigation and Capital, Steven Mirsky, partner at Mirsky Corporate Advisors, explains why procedure often determines the outcome of business litigation. From jurisdiction and venue choices to forum selection clauses, motion practice, and arbitration tactics, Steven breaks down how procedural tools shape leverage,…
  continue reading
 
Bill Kanasky, Jr. Ph.D. shares a comparison between two different performances by witnesses at a recent mock trial and how their deposition performance impacted jurors' perceptions of the credibility of the witnesses and jurors' views of the case. One of the witnesses gave several pivoting responses, using phrases like "Yeah, but...." many times, w…
  continue reading
 
The Blackstone Breakfast Briefing returns with a roller-coaster round-up of the summer’s key fraud-related judgments. In this episode, the speakers will explore sanctions, illegality and public policy (Alan MacLean KC and Tom Leary – Eurochem v Societe Generale), deep-fake AI images (Marlena Valles – Getty Images v Stability AI), and judgments obta…
  continue reading
 
As the saying goes, a good lawyer knows the law, a great lawyer knows the judge. Building credibility with the court in any case is vital. Veteran attorney and longtime judge Mark Drummond explains why and how you earn trust. Trust and credibility are built brick by brick. It takes a lifetime to build your reputation, but breach that trust once, an…
  continue reading
 
Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. talks about what attorneys and defendants get wrong about jury research. Defense teams that follow the traditional jury research model and only conduct mock trials ignore the scientific method. If you want results you can have confidence in, you have to follow the proven scientific method. Bill describes the two biggest iss…
  continue reading
 
Welcome to episode 28 of the Blackstone Chambers Litigation Podcast: Litigating War - Ukraine v Russia 2025. This session followed the European Court of Human Rights Grand Chamber judgment of 9 July 2025 in which the Grand Chamber revisited its case law on jurisdiction and held Russia responsible for “an unprecedented and flagrant attack on the fun…
  continue reading
 
Courtroom dramas make for great entertainment, but how much of what we see on screen reflects the reality of litigation? In this episode of Speaking of Litigation, we analyze iconic scenes from Succession, The Good Wife, Bridge of Spies, and more to uncover the truths—and myths—about the legal process. From Screen to Strategy: Lessons for Litigants…
  continue reading
 
Episode Summary: In this episode of Litigation and Capital, Steven Mirsky, partner at Mirsky Corporate Advisors, unpacks the complexities of shareholder and boardroom disputes in mid-market companies. He explains how money, generational conflicts, and lack of corporate formalities often drive disputes into full-scale litigation. Steven also details…
  continue reading
 
Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. discusses setting proper expectations when it comes to managing litigation and the relationship between each element in litigation. For example, Bill highlights that success in trial depends on a constellation of factors, not just one element like jury selection, and that defense teams often place too much weight on a singl…
  continue reading
 
In this episode of Litigation Nation, co-hosts Jack Sanker and Danessa Watkins dive into two legal topics currently impacting the U.S. litigation landscape. A private equity firm recently expressed interest in ownership stakes of several law firms, raising questions about the ethics of non-attorney involvement in the legal process. A prohibited pra…
  continue reading
 
In this episode of The Litigation Psychology Podcast, Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. discusses confirmation bias and its destructive impact on litigation decision-making. He explains that confirmation bias — when attorneys or claims professionals interpret case facts in ways that support their preexisting beliefs — is one of the most dangerous cognitive …
  continue reading
 
David Perla and Evan Meyerson from Burford Capital join the pod. We talk about corporate America's thoughts on #litigationfunding. While it is well known that many companies take shots at the industry when they are the #Defendants, you may be surprised to learn that these same critics are more than happy to leverage this #capital when they are purs…
  continue reading
 
Episode Summary: In this episode, attorney Steven Mirsky, partner at Mirsky Corporate Advisors, breaks down the critical issue of priority between senior and junior creditors. Drawing on real-world examples from restructurings, bankruptcies, and disputes, he explains how creditor priority impacts outcomes, why UCC1 filings are essential, and the ri…
  continue reading
 
Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. breaks down two critical mistakes attorneys make in opening statements: dilution of their message and their communication frequency. Frequency refers to the attorney’s delivery dynamics - energy level, confidence, rhythm, and emotional tone - that either engages jurors or turns them off. Common problems with communication f…
  continue reading
 
Let’s talk about associate retention, keeping those young lawyers you’ve recruited and mentored at your firm. It shouldn’t be a given that every associate will take what you’ve taught them to another firm in two or three years. Guest Ben Dachepalli is a veteran lawyer and a partner in the Tampa office of Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP specializin…
  continue reading
 
In this episode of the Litigation Psychology Podcast, Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. talks about common missteps in litigation and explains why defense teams must “stop losing before they can start winning.” He argues that many losses stem not from case facts but from preventable mistakes, as the plaintiff’s bar continues to be proactive while the defens…
  continue reading
 
Gary Goldberg, Executive Vice President at Archer Systems joins to talk about where the money goes when the cases are over. As one of the largest (if not the largest), lien resolution companies in the United States, Archer distributes billions in settlement funds from mass tort cases. While some opponents of accountability would like you to believe…
  continue reading
 
Episode Summary: In this episode of Litigation and Capital, Steven Mirsky discusses the critical aspects of choosing business partners and structuring partnerships. He emphasizes the importance of formalizing agreements early, understanding personal alignment, and implementing proper legal structures to prevent future conflicts. The conversation co…
  continue reading
 
Trucking defense attorneys Shane O'Dell and Larry Hall join hosts Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. and Steve Wood, Ph.D. to talk through several topics in trucking and transportation litigation. They begin by discussing the devastating illegal U-turn trucking accident in Florida resulting in multiple fatalities and the political fallout due to immigration …
  continue reading
 
When a merger or acquisition closes, many executives assume the legal work is over. But as this episode of Speaking of Litigation reveals, signing on the dotted line may be just the beginning. Avoid post-closing litigation with these issues in focus: Earnout Disputes: Learn how a buyer's actions can intentionally or unintentionally depress earnings…
  continue reading
 
Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. and Steve Wood, Ph.D. discuss the most common mistakes attorneys make during litigation touching on jury research, voir dire, direct examination, openings, and closings. Bill and Steve stress that in jury research, confirmation bias is a major pitfall and attorneys often dismiss unfavorable results instead of using them to …
  continue reading
 
Kelly Daley, Managing Director at Gerchen Capital Partners joins this week's episode. We talk about her role leading GCP's corporate monetization strategy and the reasons that companies with claims are choosing to pull forward revenue instead of waiting for resolution of class actions and MDLs. We also touch upon the law firm portfolio market, how …
  continue reading
 
Episode Summary: In this episode of Litigation and Capital, host Kevin Rosenquist and Steven Mirsky discuss governance gaps and challenges companies face as they scale through different revenue thresholds. They explore how leadership requirements evolve, the importance of updating legal documents, and managing strategic alignment between stakeholde…
  continue reading
 
In this episode, Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. is joined by attorneys Johan Flynn and Kevin Greene to discuss their recent nine-week asbestos trial in California that resulted in a major defense verdict. Johan and Kevin describe how they incorporated CSI’s disruptive voir dire techniques into their jury selection strategy, using them to identify unfavor…
  continue reading
 
When do you need to start thinking about finding and retaining your expert witnesses as cases progress through the litigation process? Timing is a critical part of your strategy. Often, it’s “the earlier, the better.” Guest Monica Poole is the director of expert witness services at Round Table Group, a national firm that helps litigators connect wi…
  continue reading
 
Trucking defense attorney Doug Marcello joins Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. to discuss the latest in trucking litigation. Doug provides a “state of the union” update on where the industry has been, where it is now, and where it needs to go. They address recent tort reform efforts in states like Georgia, Louisiana, and South Carolina, and the importance …
  continue reading
 
Episode Summary: In this episode of Litigation and Capital, host Kevin Rosenquist and Steven Mirsky discuss common legal strategy mistakes that can undermine business growth. They explore various challenges faced by rapidly scaling companies, from employment law compliance to corporate governance issues, and provide practical insights for businesse…
  continue reading
 
Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. talks about the role of juror beliefs and attitudes in voir dire and why they must be treated as distinct concepts. Beliefs are what jurors think (cognitive), while attitudes are how they feel (emotional). Bill emphasizes that while many attorneys stop at/after belief-based questions, it’s the follow-up attitude questions t…
  continue reading
 
Loading …

Ghid rapid de referință

Listen to this show while you explore
Play