Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Supreme Court Season episodes will include all arguments that occur from October 01st to April/May. You can listen to the sidebar version of each Supreme Court Case https://thesidebar.transistor.fm/
…
continue reading
Following what the Supreme Court is actually doing can be daunting. Reporting on the subject is often only done within the context of political narratives of the day -- and following the Court's decisions and reading every new case can be a non-starter. The purpose of this Podcast is to make it as easy as possible for members of the public to source information about what is happening at the Supreme Court. For that reason, we read every Opinion Syllabus without any commentary whatsoever. Fur ...
…
continue reading
Looking for entertaining basketball content without the drama? Check out The Supreme Court: A Basketball Podcast! Join Robaire, Chris, and Henri every Wednesday for the latest NBA headlines, news, and transactions.
…
continue reading
The latest news and analysis about key cases and critical arguments before the Supreme Court. (Updated periodically) PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders
…
continue reading
A chronological podcast of oral arguments with improved files and meta data. Hosted by Free Law Project through the CourtListener.com initiative. Not an official podcast.
…
continue reading
Unedited English audio of oral arguments at the Supreme Court of Canada. Created as a public service to promote public access and awareness of the workings of Canada’s highest court. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the Court. Original archived webcasts can be found on the Court’s website at scc-csc.ca. Feedback welcome: podcast at scchearings dot ca.
…
continue reading
Brett and Nazim are two attorneys who hate being attorneys. Each week, they discuss current Supreme Court cases with the intent to make the law more accessible to the average person, while ruminating on what makes the law both frustrating and interesting. This podcast is not legal advice and is for entertainment purposes only. If anything you hear leads you to believe you need legal advice, please contact an attorney immediately
…
continue reading
A public good: every Supreme Court Oral Argument since 2010. Making the Highest Court more accessible for a modern audience. The DC Bar blog's piece about this podcast can be found here: https://www.tinyurl.com/scotuspod. If you'd like to support the law student who created this project instead of studying you can do so here: https://www.tinyurl.com/scotusguy. Thanks for listening! Patreon
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Audio from oral arguments in the Supreme Court of the United States (beg. Oct. 2010)
…
continue reading
In depth explanations of Supreme Court Cases New Jersey v T.L.O, Mapp v Ohio, and Miranda v Arizona.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
In under 30 minutes. Do you want to understand specific cases? We are here to provide commentary on every Supreme Court case.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
A podcast feed for the audio of Supreme Court oral arguments and decision announcements. Short case descriptions are reproduced from Oyez.org under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license. This feed is not approved, managed, or affiliated with Oyez.org. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
…
continue reading
We will dive into the astounding stories of the Supreme Court.
…
continue reading
Opinion announcements from the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Podcast by Hemant Mehta
…
continue reading
The Queens Supreme Court podcast is the hilarious spinoff of the hit online series “The Queens Supreme Court” with Ts Madison. The premise of the weekly satirical show is to discuss pop culture and all the hot social media trends, topics and gossip THEN try them as cases, render judgements and sentence the crimes accordingly to determine the ultimate fate of each celebrity!
…
continue reading
Throughout the years the Supreme Court has evolved much like the rest of the federal government. This would not be without landmark rulings, which will be the main focus of this podcast. Landmark rulings lay the groundwork for laws to be overturned or upheld and allow for the United States to work toward major goals. Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/aaron-larson2/support
…
continue reading
This study, A Christian Response to the Supreme Court Decision, exposes the foreboding Danger that this ruling will bring upon our nation if things don’t turn around very quickly. You will also be thoroughly equipped to give a loving Biblical apologetic response to 15 different accusations made against Christians regarding this issue.
…
continue reading

1
Buddy Ray Underwood v. His Majesty the King (41434)
52:45
52:45
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
52:45After a trial by judge alone, the appellant, Buddy Ray Underwood, was convicted of robbery, kidnapping, unlawful confinement and murder. The trial judge acquitted the appellant of first degree murder but entered a conviction for the included offence of second degree murder instead. The respondent Crown appealed the acquittal and the appellant cross…
…
continue reading

1
Fired on Your Day Off: Malone's Exit Defies Logic
1:12:45
1:12:45
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:12:45Send us a text The Supreme Court Basketball crew discusses the shocking news that Denver Nuggets coach Mike Malone and GM Calvin Booth were fired with just three games remaining before the playoffs, despite winning a championship less than two years ago. • Reflecting on the NCAA basketball tournaments and what makes March Madness the best sporting …
…
continue reading

1
Trump v. J. G. G. (Immigration / Habeas)
8:27
8:27
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
8:27Send us a text In Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. v. J.G.G., et al., the Supreme Court granted the government’s application to vacate temporary restraining orders issued by the District Court for the District of Columbia, which had blocked the removal of several Venezuelan detainees allegedly affiliated with the foreign terr…
…
continue reading

1
Supreme Court clears way for deportations under Alien Enemies Act
5:11
5:11
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
5:11The Supreme Court ruled that the Trump administration can continue to use a rare 18th-century war authority to deport Venezuelan immigrants alleged to be gang members. But justices stipulated migrants must be given reasonable time to challenge their deportation under the Alien Enemies Act. William Brangham discussed more with Steve Vladeck, a const…
…
continue reading

1
Sex, Drugs, and Unemployment Taxes
1:02:29
1:02:29
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:02:29Brett and Nazim return to cover three Con Law cases. The first, Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, asks whether mandatory government ID verifications for adult websites violates the First Amendment. The second, Skrmetti v. US, discusses the application Equal Protection Standard for LGBT discrimination. The final case, Catholic Charities Bureau v. Wis…
…
continue reading

1
Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic
1:33:37
1:33:37
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:33:37A case in which the Court will decide whether the Medicaid Act’s “any qualified provider” provision unambiguously confers a private right upon a Medicaid beneficiary to choose a specific provider.
…
continue reading

1
Canadian Civil Liberties Association, et al. v. His Majesty the King in Right of Newfoundland and Labrador, et al. (40952)
3:27:38
3:27:38
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
3:27:38In 2020 the Chief Medical Officer of Health for Newfoundland and Labrador issued certain orders under the province’s Public Health Protection and Promotion Act, in an effort to curtail the spread of COVID-19. These orders restricted travel, by limiting the circumstances in which non-residents were permitted to enter the province. Appellant Kimberle…
…
continue reading

1
Shamar Meredith v. His Majesty the King (41370)
1:29:42
1:29:42
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:29:42The appellant, Shamar Meredith, and a co-accused were charged with first degree murder. The victim was shot multiple times in the washroom area of a restaurant. Prior to the trial, the Crown brought a motion to have a video admitted as prior discreditable conduct evidence. The trial judge ruled that the video was admissible. After the written rulin…
…
continue reading

1
Department of Education v. California (TRO)
5:41
5:41
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
5:41Send us a text In Department of Education, et al. v. California, the Supreme Court in a per curiam decision granted the federal government’s application to stay a district court order that had mandated continued payment of certain education-related grants. The District Court for the District of Massachusetts had issued a temporary restraining order…
…
continue reading

1
P.B. v. His Majesty the King (41422)
51:08
51:08
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
51:08The appellant, P.B., was charged with sexual assault for having allegedly sexually assaulted the complainant on three occasions in the course of one night. At trial, the complainant was the only witness called. The appellant argued that the complainant’s testimony was not sufficiently credible or reliable to prove the case against him beyond a reas…
…
continue reading

1
R.A. v. His Majesty the King (41421)
1:01:40
1:01:40
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:01:40In 1978, the appellant, R.A., was babysitting the then five-year-old complainant at his home. In a statement made to the police, he explained that he asked the complainant to touch him and she did so. The appellant was charged with one count of indecently assaulting the complainant contrary to s. 149 of the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1970, c. C-34. Foll…
…
continue reading

1
Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. Horn (Civil RICO)
11:24
11:24
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
11:24Send us a text In Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. Horn, the Supreme Court affirmed the Second Circuit and held that a plaintiff may seek treble damages under the civil RICO statute for injuries to business or property, even if those injuries stem from a personal injury. Douglas Horn was fired after testing positive for THC, allegedly caused by using a C…
…
continue reading

1
FDA v. Wages and White Lion Investments, LLC (Administrative Law)
14:35
14:35
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
14:35Send us a text In FDA v. Wages and White Lion Investments, the Supreme Court unanimously vacated a Fifth Circuit decision that found the Food and Drug Administration acted arbitrarily and capriciously when it denied authorization for flavored e-cigarette products. Under the Tobacco Control Act of 2009, manufacturers must receive FDA approval before…
…
continue reading

1
United States v. Miller (Bankruptcy)
10:11
10:11
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
10:11Send us a text In United States v. Miller, the Supreme Court reversed the Tenth Circuit and held that a bankruptcy trustee cannot use §544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code to claw back funds from the federal government under a state fraudulent-transfer law, due to sovereign immunity. The case arose after shareholders of a failed Utah business used $145,00…
…
continue reading

1
Ain't No Future in Yo' Frontin'
1:43:54
1:43:54
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:43:54Send us a text We break down the Lakers' crucial 134-127 win against the Memphis Grizzlies and analyze what it means for their playoff push. The trio of LeBron James, Luka Dončić, and Austin Reeves have proven to be effective, but defensive concerns persist as the team enters a brutal final stretch of regular season games. • Examining the Lakers' p…
…
continue reading

1
Supreme Court case could decide if states can block Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood
5:40
5:40
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
5:40The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in a case that could dramatically change how Medicaid recipients can choose their own medical providers. The case went before the court after South Carolina attempted to remove Planned Parenthood clinics from the state’s Medicaid program since it also provides abortions. Geoff Bennett discussed more with speci…
…
continue reading

1
Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic
1:20:24
1:20:24
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:20:24Medina v. Planned Parenthood South AtlanticDe către Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading

1
Fuld v. Palestine Liberation Organization
1:53:07
1:53:07
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:53:07A case in which the Court will decide whether the Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.
…
continue reading
Fuld v. PLODe către Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
A case in which the Court will decide whether 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2)—which strictly limits the circumstances in which an inmate can file a second petition for federal post-conviction relief—applies to all second habeas petitions (petitions filed after the first one) or only to specific types of second petitions.…
…
continue reading

1
Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review Commission
1:39:19
1:39:19
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:39:19A case in which the Court will decide whether a state violates the First Amendment’s religion clauses by denying a religious organization an otherwise-available tax exemption because the organization does not meet the state’s criteria for religious behavior.
…
continue reading

1
Bondi v. Vanderstok (ATF Ghost Guns)
7:00
7:00
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
7:00Send us a text In Bondi v. Vanderstok, the Supreme Court reversed the Fifth Circuit and upheld the ATF’s 2022 rule interpreting the Gun Control Act of 1968 (GCA) to cover certain “ghost gun” kits and unfinished firearm parts. The GCA requires licenses and background checks for firearm sales and defines “firearm” to include both weapons and their fr…
…
continue reading
Rivers v. GuerreroDe către Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading

1
Catholic Charities Bureau v. WI Labor Review Comm'n
1:25:17
1:25:17
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:25:17Catholic Charities Bureau v. WI Labor Review Comm'nDe către Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading

1
Amari Donawa v. His Majesty the King (41287)
1:08:55
1:08:55
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:08:55During a roadside stop, the police found a handgun in the fanny pack belonging to the appellant, Mr. Amari Donawa. The handgun was sent to the Centre of Forensic Sciences, but for reasons that were not explained, the police did not send the magazine or the ammunition.At trial, the expert testified that the handgun could not be fired easily without …
…
continue reading

1
Life is Sweet(16)/Love & Appreciate
1:18:55
1:18:55
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:18:55Send us a text March Madness delivers its trademark heartbreak as Colorado State falls on a buzzer-beater, reminding us why we love this tournament despite its brutal finality for college players whose careers end in an instant. • College basketball's changing landscape with NIL deals and the transfer portal creating unprecedented player movement •…
…
continue reading

1
Supreme Court upholds Biden regulation making ghost guns easier to trace
4:03
4:03
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
4:03The Supreme Court upheld Biden-era regulations on ghost guns. Those are firearms that can be put together at home with partially assembled kits, making them nearly impossible to trace. Sales of those guns exploded after they came onto the market and their use in gun crimes also rose significantly. Amna Nawaz discussed more with Jennifer Mascia of T…
…
continue reading

1
Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research
2:33:19
2:33:19
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
2:33:19A case in which the Court will decide whether Congress violated the Constitution in the way it gave power to the FCC to collect Universal Service Fund money, and whether the FCC then violated the Constitution by letting a private, industry-controlled company make those collection decisions.
…
continue reading

1
FCC v. Consumers' Research
2:11:40
2:11:40
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
2:11:40FCC v. Consumers' ResearchDe către Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading

1
Environmental Protection Agency v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, LLC
1:43:22
1:43:22
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:43:22A case in which the Court will decide whether challenges by small oil refineries seeking exemptions from the requirements of the Clean Air Act’s Renewable Fuel Standard program should be heard exclusively in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit because the agency’s denial actions are “nationally applicable” or “based on a determination of…
…
continue reading

1
Oklahoma v. Environmental Protection Agency
47:50
47:50
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
47:50A case in which the Court will decide whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has exclusive jurisdiction to review an Environmental Protection Agency action that affects only one state or region, simply because the EPA published that action alongside actions affecting other states in a single Federal Register notice.…
…
continue reading

1
EPA v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, L.L.C.
1:28:46
1:28:46
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:28:46EPA v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, L.L.C.De către Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
Oklahoma v. EPADe către Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading

1
Mohawk Council of Kanesatake v. Louis-Victor Sylvestre, et al. (41131)
1:43:06
1:43:06
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:43:06The respondents are various professionals who obtained judgments against the appellant in 2004, to which a ten-year prescriptive period applies under art. 2924 of the Civil Code of Québec. Certain actions interrupted prescription between 2005 and 2007, after which prescription started running again.A bailiff served a notice of execution on the appe…
…
continue reading

1
Stephen Emond and Claudette Emond v. Trillium Mutual Insurance Company (41077)
2:08:39
2:08:39
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
2:08:39Stephen and Claudette Emond lived in a home on the Ottawa River that was located in the catchment area of the Mississippi Valley Conservation Authority (“MVCA”). They had purchased a standard form residential homeowners’ insurance policy from Trillium Mutual Insurance Company. The Emonds’ home was deemed a total loss as a result of flooding in Apri…
…
continue reading

1
What justices said during a critical Supreme Court hearing on redistricting and race
5:01
5:01
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
5:01The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in a key redistricting case that could reshape how states draw districts by race. A group of voters identifying as "non-African American" argues Louisiana's congressional map, which created two majority-Black districts after a federal court found the previous one discriminatory, is biased toward Black voters. …
…
continue reading
A case in which the Court will decide issues relating to the 30-day deadline to seek review of a ruling by the Board of Immigration Appeals denying withholding of deportation.
…
continue reading
A case in which the Court will decide whether Louisiana’s creation of a second majority-Black congressional district constitutes unconstitutional racial gerrymandering, even when drawn in response to a federal court finding that the state’s prior single majority-Black district likely violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.…
…
continue reading
Louisiana v. CallaisDe către Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
Riley v. Bondi, Att'y Gen.De către Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading

1
Delligatti v. United States ("Crime of Violence")
7:25
7:25
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
7:25Send us a text In Delligatti v. United States, the Supreme Court held that New York attempted second-degree murder qualifies as a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. §924(c) because the knowing or intentional causation of death, whether by act or omission, necessarily involves the use of physical force under §924(c)(3)(A). Salvatore Delligatti was co…
…
continue reading

1
Thompson v. United States (Criminal / False Statement)
5:52
5:52
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
5:52Send us a text In Thompson v. United States the Supreme Court held that 18 U.S.C. §1014, which prohibits “knowingly mak[ing] any false statement” to influence the FDIC’s actions on a loan, does not extend to statements that are merely misleading but not technically false. Patrick Thompson, a former Chicago Alderman, was charged under §1014 after di…
…
continue reading
Send us a text The Lakers snap their four-game losing streak with a win against the Suns while maintaining their position in a tightly contested Western Conference. • Lakers finding team identity even with LeBron James out of the lineup • Jackson Hayes emerging as an effective big man in the pick-and-roll with Luka Dončić • Kevin Durant and the Pho…
…
continue reading

1
Nuclear Regulatory Commission v. Texas, No. 23-1300 [Arg: 3.5.2025]
1:35:51
1:35:51
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:35:51QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Hobbs Act, which authorizes a “party aggrieved” by an agency’s “final order” to petition for review in a court of appeals, allows nonparties to obtain review of claims asserting that an agency order exceeds the agency’s statutory authority; and whether the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of…
…
continue reading

1
Smith & Wesson Brands v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos, No. 23-1141 [Arg: 3.4.2025]
1:31:10
1:31:10
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:31:10QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the production and sale of firearms in the United States is the proximate cause of alleged injuries to the Mexican government stemming from violence committed by drug cartels in Mexico; and whether the production and sale of firearms in the United States amounts to “aiding and abetting” illegal firearms trafficking becau…
…
continue reading