Artificial Intelligence has suddenly gone from the fringes of science to being everywhere. So how did we get here? And where's this all heading? In this new series of Science Friction, we're finding out.
…
continue reading
Content provided by Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens, Smriti Mehta, and Daniël Lakens. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens, Smriti Mehta, and Daniël Lakens or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ro.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Aplicație Podcast
Treceți offline cu aplicația Player FM !
Treceți offline cu aplicația Player FM !
Nullius in Verba
Marcați toate (ne)redate ...
Manage series 3449375
Content provided by Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens, Smriti Mehta, and Daniël Lakens. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens, Smriti Mehta, and Daniël Lakens or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ro.player.fm/legal.
Nullius in Verba is a podcast about science—what it is and what it could be. It is hosted by Smriti Mehta from UC Berkeley and Daniël Lakens from Eindhoven University of Technology. We draw inspiration from the book Novum Organum, written in 1620 by Francis Bacon, which laid the foundations of the modern scientific method. Our logo is an homage to the title page of Novum Organum, which depicts a galleon passing between the mythical Pillars of Hercules on either side of the Strait of Gibraltar, which have been smashed by Iberian sailors to open a new world for exploration. Just as this marks the exit from the well-charted waters of the Mediterranean into the Atlantic Ocean, Bacon hoped that empirical investigation will similarly smash the old scientific ideas and lead to a greater understanding of the natural world. The title of the podcast comes from the motto of the Royal Society, set in typeface Kepler by Robert Slimbach. Our theme song is Newton’s Cradle by Grandbrothers.
…
continue reading
69 episoade
Marcați toate (ne)redate ...
Manage series 3449375
Content provided by Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens, Smriti Mehta, and Daniël Lakens. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens, Smriti Mehta, and Daniël Lakens or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ro.player.fm/legal.
Nullius in Verba is a podcast about science—what it is and what it could be. It is hosted by Smriti Mehta from UC Berkeley and Daniël Lakens from Eindhoven University of Technology. We draw inspiration from the book Novum Organum, written in 1620 by Francis Bacon, which laid the foundations of the modern scientific method. Our logo is an homage to the title page of Novum Organum, which depicts a galleon passing between the mythical Pillars of Hercules on either side of the Strait of Gibraltar, which have been smashed by Iberian sailors to open a new world for exploration. Just as this marks the exit from the well-charted waters of the Mediterranean into the Atlantic Ocean, Bacon hoped that empirical investigation will similarly smash the old scientific ideas and lead to a greater understanding of the natural world. The title of the podcast comes from the motto of the Royal Society, set in typeface Kepler by Robert Slimbach. Our theme song is Newton’s Cradle by Grandbrothers.
…
continue reading
69 episoade
Toate episoadele
×N
Nullius in Verba
1 Episode 51: Quinquagesimus - II 52:55
52:55
Redare mai Târziu
Redare mai Târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
52:55In this special two-part celebration, we answer questions submitted by our listeners. Thanks to Don Moore, Leif Nelson, Henry Wyneken, Charlotte, and Karan for the questions featured in this episode. And thank you for joining us for 50 episodes!
N
Nullius in Verba
1 Episode 50: Quinquagesimus - I 1:04:06
1:04:06
Redare mai Târziu
Redare mai Târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:04:06In this special two-part celebration, we answer questions submitted by our listeners. Thanks to James Steele, Peder Isager, and Simen Leithe Tajet for the questions featured in this episode. And thank you for joining us for 50 episodes! Shownotes Roger Scruton Quote Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2003). The theoretical status of latent variables. Psychological Review, 110 (2), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.203 Danermark, B., Ekström, M., & Karlsson, J. C. (2019). Explaining Society: Critical Realism in the Social Sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351017831 Maxwell, J. A., & Mittapalli, K. (2010). Realism as a Stance for Mixed Methods Research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie, SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research (pp. 145–168). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193.n6 Vincent, S., & O’Mahoney, J. (2017). Critical realism and qualitative research: An introductory overview (G. Grandy, C. Cassell, & A. L. Cunliffe, Eds.; pp. 201–216). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526430212 Danermark, B. (2019). Applied interdisciplinary research: A critical realist perspective. Journal of Critical Realism , 18 (4), 368–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2019.1644983…
N
Nullius in Verba
1 Episode 49: Valor Scientiae Psychologicae 1:08:50
1:08:50
Redare mai Târziu
Redare mai Târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:08:50You can listen to the podcast More of a Comment Than a Question here: https://moreofacomment.buzzsprout.com/ Our joint episode is a response to the episode ‘Final Final Final Comments’: https://moreofacomment.buzzsprout.com/1207223/episodes/16055645-final-final-final-comments
N
Nullius in Verba
1 Prologus 49: We Have to Break Up (R. B. Cialdini) 11:44
11:44
Redare mai Târziu
Redare mai Târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
11:44In preparation for our next episode, a joint recording with our friends from More of a Comment than a Question, we read a paper by Robert Cialdini about the value of social psychology for the general public. Cialdini, R. B. (2009). We Have to Break Up. Perspectives on Psychological Science , 4 (1), 5–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01091.x…
N
Nullius in Verba
How I Fail. Blog by Veronika Cheplygina https://veronikach.com/category/how-i-fail/ Arkin, R. (2011). Most Underappreciated: 50 Prominent Social Psychologists Describe Their Most Unloved Work. Oxford University Press. Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4 Sharpe, D. (2013). Why the resistance to statistical innovations? Bridging the communication gap. Psychological Methods, 18(4), 572–582. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034177 Anti-Creativity Letters episode: https://nulliusinverba.podbean.com/e/prologus-23-the-anticreativity-letters-r-e-nisbett Rouder, J. N., Haaf, J. M., & Snyder, H. K. (2019). Minimizing Mistakes in Psychological Science. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918801915 Firestein, S. (2015). Failure: Why Science Is So Successful (First Edition). Oxford University Press. Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (2019). My Biggest Research Mistake: Adventures and Misadventures in Psychological Research (1st edition). SAGE Publications, Inc.…
N
Nullius in Verba
1 Episode 47: Inductio et Deductio 1:18:06
1:18:06
Redare mai Târziu
Redare mai Târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:18:06In this episode, we delve into induction and deduction and talk further about issues related to generalizability. Shownotes Popper, K. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. (1953). Hutchinson & Co. (Originally published in 1935) Yarkoni, T. (2022). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 45 , e1. Mook, D. G. (1983). In defense of external invalidity. American psychologist, 38( 4), 379-387. Salmon, W. C. (1981). Rational Prediction. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science , 32 (2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/32.2.115 Reichenbach, H. (1938) [2006], Experience and Prediction: An Analysis of the Foundations and the Structure of Knowledge , Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Senn, S. (2007). Statistical issues in drug development (2nd ed). John Wiley & Sons. Ernst, M. D. (2004). Permutation Methods: A Basis for Exact Inference. Statistical Science , 19 (4), 676–685. Bacon, F. (1620). Instauratio magna [Novum organum] . London: John Bill. Urbach, P. (1982). Francis Bacon as a Precursor to Popper. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science , 33 (2), 113–132.…
N
Nullius in Verba
1 Episode 46: Invaliditas Externa 1:03:02
1:03:02
Redare mai Târziu
Redare mai Târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:03:02In this episode, we discuss the paper "In defense of external invalidity" by Douglas Mook. Shownotes Mook, D. G. (1983). In defense of external invalidity. American Psychologist, 38(4), 379–387. Mook, D. G. (1989). The myth of external validity. Everyday cognition in adulthood and late life, 25-43. The case of Phineas Gage was written up: Harlow, J. M. (1848). Passage of an iron rod through the head. The Boston Medical and Surgical Journal (1828-1851), 39(20)…
N
Nullius in Verba
1 Prologus 46: In Defense of External Invalidity (D. G. Mook) 52:55
52:55
Redare mai Târziu
Redare mai Târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
52:55A reading of the paper In Defense of External Invalidty by Douglas G. Mook, which will be discussed in the next episode. Mook, D. G. (1983). In defense of external invalidity. American Psychologist, 38(4), 379–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.38.4.379
N
Nullius in Verba
In this episode, we discuss the role of apprenticeship in training scientists and researchers. What’s the difference between traditional apprenticeship and cognitive apprenticeship? Does graduate training live up to its promise as an apprenticeship model? What can we do to improve the modeling of skills that are to be taught during graduate training? Shownotes Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American educator , 15 (3), 6-11. Gabrys, B. J., & Beltechi, A. (2012). Cognitive apprenticeship: The making of a scientist. In Reshaping doctoral education (pp. 144-155). Routledge. Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2016). Rigorous science: a how-to guide. MBio, 7(6), 10-1128. Alvesson, M., Gabriel, Y., & Paulsen, R. (2017). Return to meaning: A social science with something to say. Oxford University Press. Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy (M. J. Nye, Ed.). University of Chicago Press.…
N
Nullius in Verba
1 Episode 44: Reprehensio Scientiae Aperta 1:00:09
1:00:09
Redare mai Târziu
Redare mai Târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:00:09This is a live episode, recorded in Växjö, Sweden (Linnaeus university) on September 24, 2024, at the 5th meeting of the Open Science Community Sweden and the Swedish Reproducibility Network. Thanks to André Kalmendal at Mono ( https://monovaxjo.se ) for recording the episode.
N
Nullius in Verba
1 Episode 43: Historia Casus Methodi Scientifica 1:00:45
1:00:45
Redare mai Târziu
Redare mai Târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:00:45In this episode, we discuss the paper "A case history in scientific method" by B. F. Skinner Shownotes Skinner, B. F. (1956). A case history in scientific method. American psychologist, 11(5), 221. Richter, C. P. (1953). Free research versus design research. Science, 118(3056), 91–93. https://archive.org/details/WaldenTwoChapter01…
N
Nullius in Verba
1 Prologus 43: A Case Study in Scientific Method (Skinner) 1:03:17
1:03:17
Redare mai Târziu
Redare mai Târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:03:17In preparation for the next episode, in which we discuss this paper, here is a reading of: Skinner, B. F. (1956). A case history in scientific method. American Psychologist , 11 (5), 221-233.
N
Nullius in Verba
1 Episode 42: Aestimatio Scriptorum 1:05:34
1:05:34
Redare mai Târziu
Redare mai Târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:05:34In today’s episode, we discuss critically reading and appraising scientific articles. How do we select which articles to read carefully? Which heuristics are useful for assessing paper quality? And do open science practices actually lead to better quality papers? Enjoy. Shownotes Bacon, F. (1625). Of Studies . PNAS Submissions contributed by NAS members "The contributing member submits the manuscript to PNAS along with the names of at least two experts in the field of the paper who have agreed to review the work and brief comments about why each of those reviewers was chosen." https://www.pnas.org/pb-assets/authors/ifora-1720190309383.pdf How many p-values just below 0.05 should we expect across multiple tests? https://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2014/05/the-probability-of-p-values-as-function.html Lakens, D. (2024). When and How to Deviate From a Preregistration. Collabra: Psychology, 10(1), 117094. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.117094 TIER protocol: https://www.projecttier.org/tier-protocol/protocol-4-0/ Gino fraud investigation and excel meta-data: https://datacolada.org/109 REAPPRAISED checklist: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03959-6 Yang, Z., & Hung, I. W. (2021). Creative thinking facilitates perspective taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120 (2), 278.…
N
Nullius in Verba
1 Episode 41: Sodalitates Academicae 1:03:54
1:03:54
Redare mai Târziu
Redare mai Târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:03:54In this episode, we talk about academic societies, professional organizations, and academic advocacy groups, focusing primarily on the discipline of psychology. What are their roles and responsibilities? Is it necessary for researchers to join such organizations? And should we bring back scholarly soirees? Enjoy. Shownotes Royal Society Referee Reports Psychological Science APA Divisions Consistori del Gay Saber ReproducibiliTea The Royal Society Soirées…
N
Nullius in Verba
1 Episode 40: Tabula de Ethicis Recensionibus 1:13:28
1:13:28
Redare mai Târziu
Redare mai Târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:13:28In this episode, we discuss review boards for research with human subjects. Are they necessary? Are they efficient? Are scientists well equipped to make judgements about ethics? And are economists more ethical than psychologists? Shownotes Whitney, S. N. (2015). Balanced ethics review: A guide for institutional review board members. Springer. Schrag, Z. M. (2010). Ethical imperialism: Institutional review boards and the social sciences, 1965–2009. JHU Press. Kinsey Reports Masters & Johnson How Institutional Review Boards can be (and are) Weaponized Against Academic Freedom Weaponizing the IRB 2.0 Psychologists’ Involvement in Torture and the APA . Psychology Today.…
Bun venit la Player FM!
Player FM scanează web-ul pentru podcast-uri de înaltă calitate pentru a vă putea bucura acum. Este cea mai bună aplicație pentru podcast și funcționează pe Android, iPhone și pe web. Înscrieți-vă pentru a sincroniza abonamentele pe toate dispozitivele.