Flash Forward is a show about possible (and not so possible) future scenarios. What would the warranty on a sex robot look like? How would diplomacy work if we couldn’t lie? Could there ever be a fecal transplant black market? (Complicated, it wouldn’t, and yes, respectively, in case you’re curious.) Hosted and produced by award winning science journalist Rose Eveleth, each episode combines audio drama and journalism to go deep on potential tomorrows, and uncovers what those futures might re ...
…
continue reading
Content provided by ReproducibiliTea Podcast. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by ReproducibiliTea Podcast or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ro.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Aplicație Podcast
Treceți offline cu aplicația Player FM !
Treceți offline cu aplicația Player FM !
S3E3: Research Assessment Double Feature
MP3•Pagina episodului
Manage episode 361930350 series 2386163
Content provided by ReproducibiliTea Podcast. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by ReproducibiliTea Podcast or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ro.player.fm/legal.
Will, Helena and Jan talk about how we assess research and that it is weird we never really learned how to do Peer Review. Papers we discussed: Responsible Research Assessment Should Prioritize Theory Development and Testing Over Ticking Open Science Boxes: https://psyarxiv.com/ad74m/ A consensus-based tool for evaluating threats to the validity of empirical Research: https://psyarxiv.com/fc8v3 Will's blog post on peer review: https://williamngiam.github.io/blog/my_peer_review_process The tool for checking p-Values: statcheck.io The tool for checking mean values: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1948550616673876 For more info go to ReproducibiliTea.org. Do you have questions? Comments? Wanna say hi? You can reach us here: https://forms.gle/H6jgUzbbpyauLxUC8
…
continue reading
70 episoade
MP3•Pagina episodului
Manage episode 361930350 series 2386163
Content provided by ReproducibiliTea Podcast. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by ReproducibiliTea Podcast or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ro.player.fm/legal.
Will, Helena and Jan talk about how we assess research and that it is weird we never really learned how to do Peer Review. Papers we discussed: Responsible Research Assessment Should Prioritize Theory Development and Testing Over Ticking Open Science Boxes: https://psyarxiv.com/ad74m/ A consensus-based tool for evaluating threats to the validity of empirical Research: https://psyarxiv.com/fc8v3 Will's blog post on peer review: https://williamngiam.github.io/blog/my_peer_review_process The tool for checking p-Values: statcheck.io The tool for checking mean values: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1948550616673876 For more info go to ReproducibiliTea.org. Do you have questions? Comments? Wanna say hi? You can reach us here: https://forms.gle/H6jgUzbbpyauLxUC8
…
continue reading
70 episoade
Toate episoadele
×Bun venit la Player FM!
Player FM scanează web-ul pentru podcast-uri de înaltă calitate pentru a vă putea bucura acum. Este cea mai bună aplicație pentru podcast și funcționează pe Android, iPhone și pe web. Înscrieți-vă pentru a sincroniza abonamentele pe toate dispozitivele.