An appellate law podcast for trial lawyers. Appellate specialists Jeff Lewis and Tim Kowal discuss timely trial tips and the latest cases and news coming from the California Court of Appeal and California Supreme Court.
…
continue reading
The Texas Appellate Law Podcast, proudly presented by Butler Snow LLP, covers topics of interest to lawyers handling appellate matters in Texas courts and beyond. The podcast demystifies appellate law and pulls back the curtain on the appellate system through conversations with judges, court staff, and top trial and appellate practitioners. Listeners discover best practices and tips for successfully presenting their cases, managing their dockets, and promoting efficiency through legal techno ...
…
continue reading
Appellate law is a high-stakes practice area in the legal world, with published decisions setting critical precedents for future litigation. Join our co-hosts Tracy Forbath and Daniel Velladao on "The Appellate Spotlight" podcast series by Lewis Brisbois, which will delve into the latest developments in California and federal appellate courts. With extensive experience navigating the intricacies of appellate court proceedings, Tracy and Daniel along with distinguished guests will provide our ...
…
continue reading
A podcast about oral arguments before the Georgia appellate courts. Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/georgia-appellate-review/support
…
continue reading
We lawyers love to travel: but litigation is geographically bound. We're allowed to practice only in states where we're admitted. International practice is nearly nonexistent. And even cases with international aspects are limited to American courts. This podcast seeks to explore appellate litigation across the world. How do appellate courts in other countries work? What do their appellate lawyers look like? What do they do better than us? And what can we learn from them as we build our own s ...
…
continue reading
1
End the Bar Exam? with Jackie Gardina
46:49
46:49
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
46:49
Jackie Gardina shares dispatches from the Blue Ribbon Commission on reforming the Bar Exam, covering recent reforms, the ongoing debate about the exam’s effectiveness, and the rise of alternative pathways to legal licensure. Some takeaways: 💯 Yes, the passing score was dropped—but don’t worry, the old one was picked out of a hat (basically). 🗯️“End…
…
continue reading
1
Looking Back and Looking Forward | Chief Justice Nathan Hecht
50:19
50:19
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
50:19
Chief Justice Nathan Hecht is retiring after an extraordinary 43 years on the bench. In this special episode, he joins Todd Smith and Jody Sanders to reflect on his remarkable career as Texas's longest-serving Chief Justice. He shares personal stories, pivotal milestones, and the transformative reforms he championed, from modernizing court technolo…
…
continue reading
1
How the Cal. Appellate Project Promotes Appellate Experience and Access to Justice
39:51
39:51
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
39:51
There is a 700-appellate case backlog in Los Angeles and only around 450 attorneys on the California Appellate Project—Los Angeles panel. CAP-LA attorneys Jennifer Hansen and Jennifer Peabody share how the rest of us can pitch in to assuage this gap in the administration of justice. Why work as a panel attorney? Get appellate experience. Work with …
…
continue reading
1
CALP w/ Chris Dralla, Creator of Typelaw, Revolutionizing Legal Writing
40:01
40:01
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
40:01
Attorneys still wrestling with Microsoft Word to finish a brief need to be acquainted with Chris Dralla’s product Typelaw, the groundbreaking tool that lets attorneys turn plain text into fully formatted, cited, hyperlinked, local rule-compliant briefs. If your practice depends on producing high-quality briefs, here is why you need Typelaw in your …
…
continue reading
1
Reaction to Judge Jones and Prof. Vladeck's Exchange on Judge Shopping
16:34
16:34
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
16:34
In this episode, Tim and Jeff dive into the recent heated exchange between Fifth Circuit Judge Edith Jones and Georgetown Professor Stephen Vladeck at the Federalist Society’s Lawyers National Lawyers Conference. The debate centered on the tension between judicial independence and the criticism of judge shopping in high-profile cases. Tim and Jeff …
…
continue reading
1
Breaking Down the Robert Roberson Case: Criminal Appeals, Reform, and Separation of Powers | Doug Gladden
1:28:22
1:28:22
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:28:22
The highly publicized Robert Roberson case has raised critical questions about the death penalty and separation of powers. In this episode, Todd Smith and Jody Sanders sit down with criminal defense attorney Doug Gladden to tackle this difficult topic. Known for his insightful legal commentary, Doug shares his career journey from serving as a prose…
…
continue reading
1
Compelling Arbitration: Benefits & Hurdles
19:37
19:37
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
19:37
In Episode 2 of Appellate Spotlight, co-hosts Danny and Tracy discuss recent California cases that involve arbitration alongside special guest Chris Choi, a Healthcare Partner in our Sacramento office. Chris highlights the prevalence of arbitration provisions in our day-to-day lives, and how the Harrod case heard in front of the California Supreme …
…
continue reading
1
Why the Lack of an Record Is a Constitutional Problem, with Erin Smith (Part 2)
41:20
41:20
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
41:20
Responding to a decades-long lack of court reporters, the Los Angeles Superior Court in September 2024 ordered that electronic recordings may be made. This arguably violates a statute prohibiting the use of electronic recordings. But Erin Smith, co-founder of the Family Violence Appellate Project, explains why the lack of meaningful access to an ap…
…
continue reading
1
Why the Lack of an Record Is a Constitutional Problem, with Erin Smith (Part 1)
30:52
30:52
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
30:52
Erin Smith’s Family Violence Appellate Project has over 50 published cases under its belt—which is even more impressive considering how difficult it is to get a good record in these cases. In this first part of our conversation, we discuss the FVAP’s work, and the kind of mistakes trial judges make in domestic violence cases. Erin Smith’s biography…
…
continue reading
1
A New Approach to Narrowing the Texas Civil Justice Chasm | Justice Brett Busby and Kennon Wooten
1:07:41
1:07:41
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:07:41
Access to justice remains a pervasive problem in the Texas legal system. In this episode, Todd Smith and Jody Sanders welcome Texas Supreme Court Justice Brett Busby and Kennon Wooten from Austin's Scott Douglass & McConnico to discuss the latest developments on this front. The conversation focuses on new Supreme Court rules for licensing paraprofe…
…
continue reading
Couldn’t make this year’s ClioCon? Don’t know why you would if you could? Jeff is on location in Austin, Texas, and reports in on the latest legal tech trends, like: The death of the billable hour? A review of attorney tasks suggests 70% could be done with AI. This could mean more shops switch to flat fees. It could mean they increase their hourly …
…
continue reading
1
The Write Stuff, with Michelle Strowhiro
36:21
36:21
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
36:21
In a (non)definitive survey of writing instruments, big-law attorney turned solo employer counsel Michelle Strowhiro reveals her pick for the best pen for lawyers. Then we turn to the U.S. District Court of Texas ruling in Ryan LLC v. FTC, blocking an FTC rule that would ban non-competes. This rule would eliminate trade restraints already banned in…
…
continue reading
1
Supreme Court Reinstates $2.5M Discovery Sanction
18:09
18:09
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
18:09
The Supreme Court of California isn’t always interested in money disputes, but throw attorney misconduct into the mix and you get the City of LA v. Pricewaterhousecoopers reinstating a sanction for “egregious” city attorney’s office collusion totaling $2.5 million. Angling for contractual attorneys’ fees in your defense? The recent Am. Bldg. Innova…
…
continue reading
1
Electronic recordings? Not so fast.
30:35
30:35
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
30:35
Los Angeles Superior Court will now offer electronic recordings where a court reporter is not available. But not all courts have the equipment. And even if they do, by statute these recordings may not be used to create an appellate record. So what does it mean? Also, the Supreme Court in Meinhardt v. City of Sunnyvale has confirmed that orders gran…
…
continue reading
1
Adam Feldman on Empirical SCOTUS part 2
30:15
30:15
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
30:15
After discussing SCOTUS voting blocs and public perception, in part two of our discussion Adam Feldman rounds up the 2023-2024 term. We cover: SEC v. Jarkesy, holding that 7th Amendment procedural rights apply in agency proceedings, and whether Adam is surprised at the voting alignment (conservatives pro, liberals con). Loper Bright v. Raimondo, ov…
…
continue reading
1
Adam Feldman of Empirical SCOTUS, Part 1
32:19
32:19
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
32:19
Adam Feldman watches Supreme Court trends: voting blocs both usual and unusual, numbers of concurring and dissenting opinions, and other analytical ways of predicting outcomes. In our discussion, we cover: Recent polls disapprove of how the Supreme Court “is handling its job.” What does “handling its job” mean? Does it mean outcomes, or the decisio…
…
continue reading
1
“Disgrantles,” peaceful carjackings, for-profit prisons: July 9th Cir. cases
26:08
26:08
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
26:08
While the Supreme Court wrapped up its term, the Ninth Circuit had some interesting cases of its own. Carjacking is “nonviolent,” for-profit prisons are constitutional, and Covid vaccine religious exemptions are on the table. Practitioners might also look forward to focus letters and earlier panel notifications. All this and other recent cases and …
…
continue reading
1
California Law on Assumption of Risk and Waiver
18:25
18:25
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
18:25
Join co-hosts Daniel Velladao and Tracy Forbath for our inaugural episode of Appellate Spotlight, as they discuss recent developments in California case law on primary assumption of risk and waiver with special guest Amy Frerich. This exciting discussion will highlight the application of the primary assumption of risk doctrine to surfing, and wheth…
…
continue reading
1
Bridging the Gap Between Law and Technology | Colin Levy
43:08
43:08
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
43:08
In this episode, Jody Sanders and Todd Smith chat with Colin Levy, Director of Legal and Evangelist at Malbek, about his journey from being a traditional in-house lawyer to a leading voice in legal technology. Colin shares his insights on the evolving landscape of the legal industry, emphasizing the importance of bridging the gap between technology…
…
continue reading
1
E-filing outage cause a late filing? & other cases
25:41
25:41
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
25:41
A ransomware attack hit the Los Angeles County Superior Court in July 2024, affecting e-filing services. Did you miss a filing deadline because of this? We discuss two Rules of Court that could help. We also cover: Are anti-SLAPP orders “judgments”? Court of Appeal to litigants: Your adverbs are unwelcome here. Ok to say “The order is erroneous.” B…
…
continue reading
1
What next after Rahimi? with Criminal Defense Hero Don Hammond, part 2
25:08
25:08
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
25:08
Previously in part one, criminal-defense attorney Don Hammond explained why, post-Bruen, states may no longer impose discretionary constraints in concealed-carry permitting regimes. But will that change after the Supreme Court’s recent 8-1 decision in Rahimi, holding that a restraining order prohibiting a particularly violent actor from possessing …
…
continue reading
1
Jury Charge Practice After Horton v. Kansas City Railway Co.
43:33
43:33
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
43:33
Jury charge practice in Texas trials just got a shakeup thanks to the recent Horton v. Kansas City Railway Co. decision. In today’s episode, Todd Smith and Jody Sanders delve into the Texas Supreme Court’s recent pivot on Casteel error in jury charges. They analyze the implications for appellate practice, sparked by the Court’s revised stance in th…
…
continue reading
1
Justice Anita Earls Part 2: The investigation into her statements on diversity
25:27
25:27
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
25:27
Justice Anita Earls of the North Carolina Supreme Court knows about some reforms that will improve our justice system. But she also knows about some that will provoke an unhappy response—including an investigation against her personally. In this second half of our interview, Justice Earls talks about how she found herself under investigation for ca…
…
continue reading
1
CCW Permits with Criminal Defense Hero Don Hammond, part 1
37:25
37:25
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
37:25
Just because you’re law-abiding doesn’t mean you won’t need a criminal-defense attorney. There are more criminal laws in federal and California state law books than you could read in a decade. (I asked ChatGPT: if you printed them all out, they would be taller than the 24-story AT&T building in San Diego.) Enter Criminal Defense Hero Don Hammond. I…
…
continue reading
1
Balancing Tradition and Innovation in Legal Education | Dean Bobby Ahdieh
59:21
59:21
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
59:21
The legal world is undergoing a seismic shift. Technological advancements and a changing social landscape force the legal profession to adapt, but are law schools keeping pace? In this episode, Jody Sanders and Todd Smith visit with Dean Robert B. Ahdieh of Texas A&M Law School about the state of modern legal education and more. Dean Ahdieh shares …
…
continue reading
1
Justice Anita Earls and the Court as an Institution: Part 1
34:17
34:17
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
34:17
Justice Anita Earls of the North Carolina Supreme Court knows about some reforms that will improve our justice system. But she also knows about some that will provoke an unhappy response—including an investigation against her personally. In this first part of our interview, we discuss Justice Earls’ path from a 30-year civil rights attorney to supr…
…
continue reading
1
Abortion Pills and Vaccine Mandates
27:52
27:52
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
27:52
We have a few big cases to cover: The Supreme Court, 9-0, guaranteed continued access to abortion pills. A 9th Circuit split panel, meanwhile, allows a challenge to a Covid-19 vaccine mandate to proceed, challenging Buck v. Bell forced sterilization-era public health precedent. And a get-out-of-arbitration-free card case get reversed on FAA grounds…
…
continue reading
1
Prelude to the Business Court and 15th Court of Appeals: More Questions Than Answers | Tyler Talbert
54:16
54:16
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
54:16
The Texas legal landscape will change significantly on September 1, 2024, with the launch of the Business Court and the 15th Court of Appeals. While the start date is set, many details are still uncertain. In this episode, Tyler Talbert, a board-certified civil appellate lawyer from Waco, joins hosts Todd Smith and Jody Sanders to delve into these …
…
continue reading
1
The appellate court that overruled a supreme court: Part 2 with John Sylvester
28:06
28:06
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
28:06
John Sylvester was the counsel of record in the controversial Abdelqader v. Abraham published opinion. In the previous episode we discussed why it was controversial. (Short version: because the Court of Appeal, sub silentio, thumbed its nose at the Supreme Court and concluded that a missing finding required by statute gives you a an automatic get-a…
…
continue reading
1
The appellate court that overruled a supreme court: Part 1 with John Sylvester
32:24
32:24
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
32:24
John Sylvester was the counsel of record in the controversial Abdelqader v. Abraham published opinion. Why was it controversial? Because the Court of Appeal thumbed its nose at the Supreme Court, which had held in F.P. v. Monier that just because the trial judge forgets to make a required written finding you don’t get an automatic get-a-new-trial-f…
…
continue reading
1
Exploring Procedural Justice | Judge Steve Leben
53:19
53:19
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
53:19
Judges represent not only their judicial office, but also the legitimacy of the judicial branch as a whole. For many Americans, their only interaction with the legal system may come from a single trip to the courthouse. This makes it imperative for judges to leave participants in the system feeling that they have been treated fairly and respectfull…
…
continue reading
1
Top 10 Tips to Avoid Fee Disputes, with Carl Mueller
35:12
35:12
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
35:12
Every attorney has felt the concern over a growing receivable, and the frustration of a nonpaying client. In the continuation of our discussion in the last episode, Carl Mueller shares his top 10 tips to avoid them and win them. The tips include: See a “red flag”? Trust your gut, and run. Check your retainer agreements for compliance with Business …
…
continue reading
1
How to Avoid Fee Disputes, with Carl Mueller
29:41
29:41
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
29:41
Every attorney has felt the concern over a growing receivable, and the frustration of a nonpaying client. Carl Mueller litigates these billing disputes and explains what attorneys should know to avoid them and to win them: All the billing disputes are basically the same, so… Spot the “red flags.” (You know what they are.) If you do get into a dispu…
…
continue reading
1
Focus Groups as a Trial-Preparation Tool | Elizabeth Larrick
49:19
49:19
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
49:19
Preparation is the key to winning at trial, and focus groups are a powerful tool for ensuring that a case is trial-ready. In this episode of the Texas Appellate Law Podcast, hosts Todd Smith and Jody Sanders visit with Austin-based trial lawyer and consultant Elizabeth Larrick of the Larrick Law Firm. Elizabeth shares her passion for helping lawyer…
…
continue reading
1
Top 10 Tips from Court of Appeal Research Attorneys
36:44
36:44
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
36:44
Appellate justices’ research attorneys are the ones advising the justices about your arguments and writing the opinions. We discuss 10 tips offered at a recent Orange County Bar Association event. Here is a taste: 😮 Biggest surprise: The Court of Appeal wants hyperlinked briefs. They want to be able to click on your record cites to confirm your fac…
…
continue reading
1
Why One School District Spent $1 Million Fighting Special-Education Attorney Tim Adams’ Client (Part 2)
33:44
33:44
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
33:44
Last time, we set the table with special-education attorney Tim Adams to discuss the big 9th Circuit win for parents of kids with IEPs (individualized education protocols). Now we dig in to Irvine Unified School District v. Landers and Gagliano. After covering the fact that the school district, to get out of helping a dyslexic student get the help …
…
continue reading
1
Tips for Persuasive Legal Writing | Luther Munford
52:19
52:19
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
52:19
Lawyers are professional writers, and the ability to write persuasively is more important than ever. In this episode, Luther Munford, an appellate expert and former law professor, joins Todd Smith and Jody Sanders for an insightful discussion on the principles of persuasive legal writing. Luther emphasizes the importance of ethos, logos, and pathos…
…
continue reading
1
Why One School District Spent $1 Million Fighting Special-Education Attorney Tim Adams’ Client (Part 1)
30:29
30:29
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
30:29
A big 9th Circuit win for parents of kids with IEPs (individualized education protocols) came down recently, and the prevailing attorney is podcast alum Tim Adams. In the first of this two-part discussion, we set the table to discuss Irvine Unified School District v. Landers and Gagliano. For example, to understand why parents trying to help their …
…
continue reading
1
What to know about “snap” and “super snap” removals
13:04
13:04
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
13:04
Are you expecting a lawsuit? And do you want to get that lawsuit into federal court? If your client is domiciled in California, you need to know about “snap removals.” If you get wind of the lawsuit before it is served, you might be able to defeat the removal-bar on home-state defendants. But don’t commit a “super snap” removal. That’s when you rem…
…
continue reading
1
Winning Cases on Legal Issues Before and During Trial
1:04:32
1:04:32
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:04:32
As civil trials become more expensive and less frequent, proactive attorneys should look for ways to streamline or end their cases before trial. Luckily, both Texas statutes and court rules provide some helpful tools. In this episode Todd Smith and Jody Sanders discuss ways parties can address legal issues before, during, and after trial that can s…
…
continue reading
1
Is the Racial Justice Act Unconstitutional?
23:35
23:35
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
23:35
Racial minorities are sometimes removed from prospective juries—just like everybody else. But the Legislature is so concerned that this could happen on the (obviously improper) basis of race that the Racial Justice Act prohibits a challenge to a racial minority even on the basis of proper factors, such as lack of life experience. And if that happen…
…
continue reading
1
Top 10 Tips for Family Law Appeals
25:52
25:52
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
25:52
Every day as an appeals lawyer brings new puzzles. But some puzzles repeat. So in this episode, we compile the top 10 tips dispensed regularly to trial attorneys working in family court. They include: 👉 Know your appealable issues—appeal now, or lose it forever! 👉 Request a statement of decision. Don’t need to, you say? Judge already gave a tentati…
…
continue reading
1
Social Media and Jury Waiver High Court Cases, and Other Appellate News
36:22
36:22
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
36:22
The U.S. Supreme Court provides awaited guidance on public officials’ use of social media, and the California Supreme Court gives a cautionary tale about waiving the right to a jury trial. Jeff and I discuss: 📰Free Speech on Government Social Media: Lindke v. Freed (Mar. 15, 2024, No. 22-611), notable for being short and unanimous, holds that, when…
…
continue reading
1
Five Hard Truths About an Appellate Practice, with Raffi Melkonian
52:53
52:53
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
52:53
Raffi Melkonian has argued and won in the U.S. Supreme Court, and started the #AppellateTwitter community of appellate attorneys on Twitter/X, where he has over 65,000 followers, and speaks and writes on appeals across the country. And Raffi is here to tell you that building a business on an appellate practice—even a very successful one—is very har…
…
continue reading
1
Navigating Federal Tort Claims on a National Scale | Tom Jacob
49:31
49:31
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
49:31
Suing the federal government can be a daunting task. In this episode, Todd Smith and Jody Sanders sit down with Tom Jacob, a partner at National Trial Law in Austin, Texas, to discuss the intricacies of litigating cases under the Federal Tort Claims Act. Tom highlights the groundbreaking Sutherland Springs mass-shooting case, in which his firm secu…
…
continue reading
1
Sanctions, Successful Reconsideration, and Other Feb. 2024 Cases
45:21
45:21
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
45:21
We discuss how to avoid appellate sanctions, and an unusually successful motion for reconsideration: $50k sanctions against appellant for blowing appellate procedure. Motion for reconsideration was untimely, but righteous. Trial judge did not take the Court of Appeal’s hint, so writ issued. (But the trial judge was right to let the writ issue.) Ant…
…
continue reading
1
Why Judges Should Take the Legal Accountability Project Pledge | Judge Doug Nazarian & Aliza Shatzman
1:06:47
1:06:47
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:06:47
Judicial clerkships can provide unparalleled access and prestige to young lawyers just entering practice. But because the judiciary requires confidentiality and secrecy to operate properly, often law students don’t know what to expect. The Legal Accountability Project is working to change that by making the system more transparent for law schools a…
…
continue reading
1
Judge Nazarian to Judges: Take the Accountability Pledge
1:02:59
1:02:59
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:02:59
There are 30,000 law clerks in the U.S., and we have no good way to know to judge their experiences. So Judge Douglas Nazarian of the Appellate Court of Maryland—and board member of the Legal Accountability Project—asks judges everywhere to take the LAP Pledge. The Project hosts a growing database of survey responses from judicial clerks, but it ne…
…
continue reading
1
Sleep Well to Crush Your Enemies, with Leslie Porter
52:11
52:11
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
52:11
You thought health and wellness was just for hippies, losers and weirdos. But you were wrong. Leslie Porter explains that if you are waiting for your health issues to become acute enough for a prescription, you are not at your best. Not only are you laying the groundwork for possible big problems down the road, you have lower energy, weakened drive…
…
continue reading
1
So You Think You Understand the Snitch Rule?
56:27
56:27
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
56:27
Next time your opposing counsel takes issue with something you say, don’t be surprised to find a complaint in the next filing citing to rule 8.3 of the Rules of Professional Conduct—the new “snitch rule.” There are about a dozen terms of legal art in the snitch rule, so we asked Judge Meredith Jury (Ret.) and Certified Bankruptcy Specialist Stella …
…
continue reading