))
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
1
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
Jake Leahy
The Supreme Court decision syllabus, read without personal commentary. See: Wheaton and Donaldson v. Peters and Grigg, 33 U.S. 591 (1834) and United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U.S. 321, 337. Photo by: Davi Kelly. Founded by RJ Dieken. Now hosted by Jake Leahy. *Note this podcast is for informational and educational purposes only. Hosted by a non-attorney.*
…
continue reading
The latest news and analysis about key cases and critical arguments before the Supreme Court. (Updated periodically) PBS NewsHour is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders
…
continue reading
Unedited English audio of oral arguments at the Supreme Court of Canada. Created as a public service to promote public access and awareness of the workings of Canada's highest court. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the Court. Original archived webcasts can be found on the Court's website at scc-csc.ca. Feedback welcome: podcast at scchearings dot ca.
…
continue reading
Supreme Court Season episodes will include all arguments that occur from October 01st to June/July. SIDEBAR Episodes will take place between the end of the current term and the start of the next term. (July - October)
…
continue reading
T
The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court
1
The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court
The Citizens Guide to the Supreme Court
Brett and Nazim are two attorneys who hate being attorneys. Each week, they discuss current Supreme Court cases with the intent to make the law more accessible to the average person, while ruminating on what makes the law both frustrating and interesting. This podcast is not legal advice and is for entertainment purposes only. If anything you hear leads you to believe you need legal advice, please contact an attorney immediately
…
continue reading
L
Law360's The Term - News & Analysis on the Supreme Court
1
Law360's The Term - News & Analysis on the Supreme Court
Law360 - Legal News & Analysis
The Term is a podcast from Law360 for the busy U.S. Supreme Court watcher. Give us about 15 minutes each week and we'll catch you up on all the big action at the nation's highest court, along with a list of what to watch in the coming sessions. Hosts senior Supreme Court reporter Jimmy Hoover in Washington, D.C. and editor-at-large Natalie Rodriguez in New York City cut through a busy docket to focus on the key cases and developments everyone will be talking about.
…
continue reading
Government court cases
…
continue reading
Audio from oral arguments in the Supreme Court of the United States (beg. Oct. 2010)
…
continue reading
O
Oral Arguments for the Supreme Court of the United States
1
Oral Arguments for the Supreme Court of the United States
Free Law Project
A chronological podcast of oral arguments with improved files and meta data. Hosted by Free Law Project through the CourtListener.com initiative. Not an official podcast.
…
continue reading
In depth explanations of Supreme Court Cases New Jersey v T.L.O, Mapp v Ohio, and Miranda v Arizona.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States of America.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
A podcast feed for the audio of Supreme Court oral arguments and decision announcements. Short case descriptions are reproduced from Oyez.org under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license. This feed is not approved, managed, or affiliated with Oyez.org. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
…
continue reading
We will dive into the astounding stories of the Supreme Court.
…
continue reading
Opinion announcements from the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
The Queens Supreme Court podcast is the hilarious spinoff of the hit online series “The Queens Supreme Court” with Ts Madison. The premise of the weekly satirical show is to discuss pop culture and all the hot social media trends, topics and gossip THEN try them as cases, render judgements and sentence the crimes accordingly to determine the ultimate fate of each celebrity!
…
continue reading
T
The Supreme Court vs. Church/State Separation
1
The Supreme Court vs. Church/State Separation
Hemant Mehta
Podcast by Hemant Mehta
…
continue reading
T
The Supreme Court: A Basketball Podcast
1
The Supreme Court: A Basketball Podcast
Robaire Taylor, Chris Young, Henri Taylor
Any listeners out there...really want entertaining basketball content? Don't want to worry about the hosts - all on the show trying to force "controversial" hot takes, all in your earbuds, yelling back and forth to win an argument? Come to The Supreme Court: A Basketball Podcast! Check back with the SC trio; Robaire, Chris, and Henri, Wednesdays as we discuss the latest NBA headlines, news, and transactions.
…
continue reading
L
Landmark Decisions in the United States Supreme Court
1
Landmark Decisions in the United States Supreme Court
Aaron Larson
Throughout the years the Supreme Court has evolved much like the rest of the federal government. This would not be without landmark rulings, which will be the main focus of this podcast. Landmark rulings lay the groundwork for laws to be overturned or upheld and allow for the United States to work toward major goals. Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/aaron-larson2/support
…
continue reading
A
A Christian Response to the Supreme Court Decision
1
A Christian Response to the Supreme Court Decision
Get A Life Media, Billy Crone
This study, A Christian Response to the Supreme Court Decision, exposes the foreboding Danger that this ruling will bring upon our nation if things don’t turn around very quickly. You will also be thoroughly equipped to give a loving Biblical apologetic response to 15 different accusations made against Christians regarding this issue.
…
continue reading
This week's episode covers big opinions from the past few weeks, including Twitter v. Taamneh (whether social media is civilly liable for terrorism), Sackett v. EPA (how do different justices interpret the Clean Water Act), Pork Council v. Ross (does the Dormant Commerce Clause bar California from legislating out of State) and Andy Warhol Foundatio…
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
1
Glacier Northwest v. Teamsters (Labor)
8:22
8:22
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
8:22
In Glacier Northwest v. Teamsters, the Supreme Court reviewed whether the National Labor Relations Act preempts Glacier's state tort law claims that allege the Teamsters intentionally destroyed the company's concrete trucks when the truckers did not complete their deliveries in transit. The Court held that these claims were not preempted by federal…
…
continue reading
L
Law360's The Term - News & Analysis on the Supreme Court
1
S4, E32: Union Strikes Out At High Court In Cement Case
12:08
12:08
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
12:08
In one of the blockbuster employment cases of the term, the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday gave companies the green light to sue over strikes that are structured to cause intentional damage to their property, dealing a blow to unions who argued that exposing strike actions to litigation could chill worker collective action. We talk you through the …
…
continue reading
P
PBS NewsHour - Supreme Court
1
U.S. colleges divided over whether to end legacy admissions
5:48
5:48
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
5:48
In the coming weeks, the U.S. Supreme Court is expected to issue its ruling on the use of race in college admissions. The case is focusing attention on other practices used in admissions that may need to change, including the children of alumni who often have preference and are often white and affluent. Geoff Bennett discussed legacy applicants wit…
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court of Canada Hearings
1
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, et al. v. Aydin Coban, et al. (40223)
2:10:18
2:10:18
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
2:10:18
(PUBLICATION BAN IN CASE) An accused was charged with several offences. Before the jury selection process began, a ban on publication was imposed on all pre-trial applications in the proceedings pursuant to s. 648(1) of the Criminal Code. A consortium of major media outlets applied to have the ban clarified and declared applicable only after the ju…
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
1
Slack Technologies v. Pirani (Securities Act)
8:39
8:39
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
8:39
In Slack Technologies v. Pirani the Court held that Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 requires the plaintiff to prove that they purchased securities that were registered under a materially misleading registration statement. The Court rejected the argument that the term "such security" could include securities that were not registered under a…
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
1
U.S. ex rel. Schutte v. SuperValu Inc. (False Claims Act)
7:30
7:30
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
7:30
Supreme Court's decision is here. The False Claims Act allows for private citizens to bring a cause of action on behalf of the United Sates, against a person who "knowingly" submits a "false claim" to a federal program. The defendant can meet the knowledge requirement by, 1.) actual knowledge that the reported prices were not "usual and customary,"…
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
1
Dupree v. Younger (1983 Post-Trial Motion)
5:34
5:34
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
5:34
In Dupree v. Younger, the Supreme Court addressed whether a post-trial motion of a purely legal issue that was resolved at summary judgment, requires a post-trial motion to be preserved on appeal. Kevin Younger sued Neil Dupree, who was a correctional officer under Section 1983. Dupree moved for summary judgment alleging that Younger had failed to …
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
1
Sackett v. EPA (Clean Water Act)
17:10
17:10
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
17:10
In Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency, the Supreme Court examines the scope the terms "waters" under the Clean Water Act. The EPA ordered the Sackets, who purchased property in Idaho, to restore the property after the family had backfilled it with dirt. The EPA claimed that putting dirt on their property violated the Clean Water Act, and th…
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
1
Tyler v. Hennepin County (Takings Clause)
6:08
6:08
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
6:08
In Tyler v. Hennepin County, Chief Justice Roberts writes for the majority, reversing the Eighth Circuit. The District Court and Circuit Court had rejected a taxpayer's claim that Hennepin County keeping the $25,000 surplus after a tax sale violated both the Takings Clause under the Fifth Amendment and the prohibition on excessive fines under the E…
…
continue reading
L
Law360's The Term - News & Analysis on the Supreme Court
1
S4, E31: Justices Dry Up Water Regulation
15:29
15:29
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
15:29
The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday set out to clarify what constitutes “waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act and, in the process, settled on a more narrow reading that will limit the federal government’s authority to regulate wetlands. On this week’s episode of The Term, Law360 environmental senior reporter Juan Carlos Rodriguez d…
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
1
Calcutt v. FDIC (Administrative Review)
13:06
13:06
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
13:06
The Supreme Court reversed the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, reasoning that the Court of Appeals must reverse the administrative agency if it reaches the same outcome for a different reason. Once an administrative agency has made an error of law, the decision must be remanded back to the administrative agency. Per Curiam. Read by Jake Leahy.…
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
1
Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (Copyright Fair Use)
19:18
19:18
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
19:18
In Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith et al., the Supreme Court ruled that the commercial licensing of a derivative artwork by Andy Warhol, based on a copyrighted photograph taken by Lynn Goldsmith, did not qualify as fair use. The case involved the licensing of Warhol's "Orange Prince" image. This well-known image includ…
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
1
Ohio Adjutant General’s Dept. v. FLRA (Labor)
7:20
7:20
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
7:20
In Ohio Adjutant General's Department v. FLRA, the Supreme Court ruled that the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (FSLMRS) grants jurisdiction to the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA) over labor disputes involving state National Guards when they hire and supervise dual-status technicians in their civilian roles. These techni…
…
continue reading
On the same day, the Court released its decision in Twitter v. Taamneh. The Court largely disposed of the claims in Twitter, stating that Taamneh had failed to state a claim under the federal statute. Here, the Court in its per curiam opinion, writes that it need not consider the veracity of the Section 230 claims because Twitter's reasoning requir…
…
continue reading
The patent requires certain particularity, such that any person skilled in the craft would be able to manufacture, make, construct, or use the invention. The Court held that Amgen's patent failed to provide the detail required to protect its interest, in part, because the patent applies to a wide range of antibodies and requires a certain level of …
…
continue reading
P
PBS NewsHour - Supreme Court
1
New book 'Shadow Docket' explores Supreme Court's growing influence on American law
6:39
6:39
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
6:39
A new book explores the Supreme Court's growing influence on the country through emergency actions on cases not on the official docket. For the past decade or so, the court has gotten involved in cases concerning big issues, often setting new principles without hearing arguments and without explaining their reasoning. John Yang discussed that with …
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
1
Twitter v. Taamneh (Aiding and Abetting ISIS)
18:27
18:27
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
18:27
Taamneah brought suit against social media companies, alleging that the companies were "aiding and abetting" ISIS by providing a platform and recommendations to the companies. HELD: The social media companies did not knowingly aid and abet ISIS, and therefore, no claim can be brought under the Anti-Terrorism Act.…
…
continue reading
Chief Justice Roberts writes for the majority in this case: "As an old joke goes: 'I believe we should all pay taxes with a smile. I tried but they wanted cash.'" The IRS is authorized by statute to issue a summons to third parties to aid in the "collection" of an assessment against a taxpayer. There are certain notice requirements and exceptions t…
…
continue reading
L
Law360's The Term - News & Analysis on the Supreme Court
1
S4, E30: The Internet Survives The Supreme Court, For Now
22:35
22:35
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
22:35
The case that many court watchers speculated could break the internet by curtailing protections for social media companies sued over content on their platforms landed with a thud on Thursday, as the Supreme Court remanded the case back without weighing in on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. On this week’s episode of The Term we talk t…
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court of Canada Hearings
1
La Presse inc. v. Frédérick Silva, et al. (40175)
2:11:03
2:11:03
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
2:11:03
(CERTAIN INFORMATION NOT AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC) The respondent Frédérick Silva was charged with four counts of murder and one count of attempted murder based on incidents that occurred on February 21, 2017, and December 20, 2018. On November 22, 2019, the prosecution laid five charges by direct indictment. On August 2 and October 15, 2021, respec…
…
continue reading
P
PBS NewsHour - Supreme Court
1
A look at primary elections and battles over abortion rights at the state level
11:12
11:12
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
11:12
There are political battles on the state level this week with a handful of primary races heating up and action on abortion laws. We check in with reporters Colin Campbell of North Carolina, Ryland Barton of Kentucky and Katie Meyer of Pennsylvania to help bring us up to speed. PBS NewsHour is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funder…
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court of Canada Hearings
1
George Zacharias v. His Majesty the King (40117)
1:18:35
1:18:35
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:18:35
The appellant, George Zacharias, was convicted under s. 5(2) of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, S.C. 1996, c. 19, for possession of 101.5 pounds of cannabis for the purpose of trafficking. The main issue at trial was whether Cst. MacPhail, who conducted a traffic stop of Mr. Zacharias’ truck, had reasonable suspicion to enter into an inves…
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
1
Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. Centro de Periodismo Investigativo, Inc. (Sovereign Immunity)
8:14
8:14
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
8:14
"The question presented is whether the statute categorically abrogates (legalspeak for eliminates) any sovereign immunity the board enjoys from legal claims. We hold it does not. Under long-settled law, Congress must use unmistakable language to abrogate sovereign immunity. Nothing in the statute creating the board meets that high bar." (First para…
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
1
National Pork Producers v. Ross (Dormant Commerce Clause)
17:55
17:55
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
17:55
In National Pork Producers v. Ross, the Supreme Court reviewed whether California's Proposition 12 regulatory requirements relating to conditions for in-state pork sales unconstitutionally interfered with out-of-state businesses in violation of the dormant commerce clause. From Justice Gorsuch's majority opinion: "Assuredly, under this Court’s dorm…
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
1
Percoco v. United States (Jury Instructions)
9:16
9:16
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
9:16
In Percoco v. United States, the Supreme Court considered whether a private citizen with influence over government decision-making can be convicted for wire fraud on the theory that he or she deprived the public of its “intangible right of honest services.” Joseph Percoco, former Executive Deputy Secretary to New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, was cha…
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
1
Ciminelli v. United States (Wire Fraud)
7:36
7:36
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
7:36
In Ciminelli v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Circuit's right-to-control theory of wire fraud cannot be used as the basis for a conviction under federal fraud statutes. Louis Ciminelli was convicted of federal wire fraud for his involvement in a scheme to rig the bid process for state-funded development projects under Gover…
…
continue reading
This week's episode covers two cases, Gonzales v. Google and Twitter v. Taamneh, which appear to cover broad, important issues at first (the recruitment of terrorism on the internet), but seem more likely to affect narrow, trivial issues later on (how Youtube recommends videos for you). This episode also talks voting, Legend of Zelda and Shake Shac…
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
1
Santos-Zacaria v. Garland (Immigration / Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies)
8:43
8:43
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
8:43
In Santos-Zacaria v. Garland, the Supreme Court reviewed two questions. First, whether §1252(d)(1) is jurisdictional; and second, whether a non-citizen is required to request reconsideration of an adverse board action to fully exhaust administrative remedies under the law. HELD: Santos-Zacaria is correct and the Fifth Circuit was incorrect to find …
…
continue reading
L
Law360's The Term - News & Analysis on the Supreme Court
1
S4, E29: Huzzah, Here Come The High Court Opinions
17:47
17:47
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
17:47
The U.S. Supreme Court finally chipped away at its mountain of outstanding opinions, releasing five decisions on Thursday. Among those, one upheld a California law banning in-state sales of pork products that come from animals kept in confined spaces, and another favored a trans asylum seeker who sought an appellate court review of their immigratio…
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
1
MOAC Mall Holdings LLC v. Transform Holdco LLC (Bankruptcy Jurisdiction)
9:01
9:01
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
9:01
Section 363(m) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code is not a jurisdictional provision. Courts should not construe a statute to be jurisdictional unless clearly stated. A jurisdictional provisions puts a limit on the jurisdiction of federal courts. Guest recorded by Jeff Barnum.De către Jake Leahy
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
1
Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. United States (Foreign Immunity)
8:14
8:14
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
8:14
Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. (Halkbank) vs. the United States involves the criminal prosecution against Halkbank for evading American economic sanctions against Iran. Halkbank claims immunity, as an instrumentality of a foreign state under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976 (FSIA). The Supreme Court held that the District Court has jurisdict…
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
1
Wilkins v. United States (Quiet Title Act)
8:33
8:33
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
8:33
In Wilkins v. United States, the Supreme Court addressed a dispute between property owners in rural Montana and the government regarding a road easement. The government claimed that the easement included public access, while the property owners disagreed. The property owners sued the government under the Quiet Title Act, but the government argued t…
…
continue reading
P
PBS NewsHour - Supreme Court
1
Payments made to Justice Thomas' wife raise more ethical questions about Supreme Court
5:05
5:05
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
5:05
For the fourth time in a month, a report raises questions about Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and his rich friends. This time it's money going to Ginni Thomas, the justice's wife. According to the Washington Post, Leonard Leo directed pollster Kellyanne Conway to give Ginni Thomas "another $25k" and bill it to a nonprofit that Leo advised. …
…
continue reading
L
Law360's The Term - News & Analysis on the Supreme Court
1
S4, E28: The Beginning Of The End Of Chevron Deference?
21:17
21:17
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
21:17
The U.S. Supreme Court took up a case this week that could be the end of the road for a nearly 40-year precedent requiring judges to defer to federal agencies when interpreting statutes that are ambiguous – otherwise known as Chevron doctrine. On this week’s episode of The Term, we talk through how the issue landed at the court, and how far it migh…
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
1
New York v. New Jersey (Interstate Compact)
4:43
4:43
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
4:43
New York and New Jersey entered into a compact in 1953 to establish the Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor to conduct regulatory and law enforcement activities at the Port, and in 2018, New Jersey sought to withdraw from the Compact, resulting in New York filing a bill of complaint in this Court. HELD: Despite New York's opposition, New Jerse…
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
1
Axon Enterprises v. FTC (Administrative Jurisdiction)
12:34
12:34
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
12:34
Michelle Cochran and Axon Enterprise each filed a federal district court lawsuit, challenging the constitutionality of the agency proceedings against them in separate enforcement actions initiated in the SEC and the FTC. Both suits were initially dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, but the Fifth Circuit disagreed as to the SEC question, finding tha…
…
continue reading
P
PBS NewsHour - Supreme Court
1
Senate probes Supreme Court ethics after questionable financial dealings by justices
8:37
8:37
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
8:37
Lawmakers on Capitol Hill are spotlighting recent ethics concerns surrounding the highest court in the land. In a Judiciary Committee hearing Tuesday, senators debated how to address concerns involving Supreme Court justices, including whether they should apply ethical guidelines to the court themselves. Amna Nawaz discussed the hearing with Univer…
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
1
Luna Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools (ADA in Public Schools)
6:23
6:23
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
6:23
Miguel Luna Perez, a deaf student who attended schools in Michigan's Sturgis Public School District, was denied graduation. his family filed a complaint with the Michigan Department of Education claiming that the district failed to provide him with a free and appropriate public education under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).…
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
Tyler v. Hennepin County, Minnesota, No. 22-166 [Arg: 04.26.2023]
1:40:51
1:40:51
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:40:51
Issue(s): (1) Whether taking and selling a home to satisfy a debt to the government, and keeping the surplus value as a windfall, violates the Fifth Amendment's takings clause; and (2) whether the forfeiture of property worth far more than needed to satisfy a debt, plus interest, penalties, and costs, is a fine within the meaning of the Eighth Amen…
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
Yegiazaryan v. Smagin, No. 22-381 [Arg: 04.25.2023]
1:04:10
1:04:10
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:04:10
Issue(s): Whether a foreign plaintiff states a cognizable civil claim under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act when it suffers an injury to intangible property, and if so, under what circumstances. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★De către Austin Songer
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Coughlin, No. 22-227 [Arg: 04.24.2023]
58:13
58:13
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
58:13
Issue(s): Whether the Bankruptcy Code expresses unequivocally Congress’ intent to abrogate the sovereign immunity of Indian tribes. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★De către Austin Songer
…
continue reading
S
Supreme Court of the United States
1
Dupree v. Younger, No. 22-210 [Arg: 04.24.2023]
58:09
58:09
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
58:09
Issue(s): Whether to preserve the issue for appellate review a party must reassert in a post-trial motion a purely legal issue rejected at summary judgment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★De către Austin Songer
…
continue reading
