The latest news and analysis about key cases and critical arguments before the Supreme Court. (Updated periodically) PBS NewsHour is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders
…
continue reading
The Supreme Court decision syllabus, read without personal commentary. See: Wheaton and Donaldson v. Peters and Grigg, 33 U.S. 591 (1834) and United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U.S. 321, 337. Photo by: Davi Kelly. Founded by RJ Dieken. Now hosted by Jake Leahy. Frequent guest host Jeff Barnum. *Note this podcast is for informational and educational purposes only.
…
continue reading
Unedited English audio of oral arguments at the Supreme Court of Canada. Created as a public service to promote public access and awareness of the workings of Canada’s highest court. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the Court. Original archived webcasts can be found on the Court’s website at scc-csc.ca. Feedback welcome: podcast at scchearings dot ca.
…
continue reading
Brett and Nazim are two attorneys who hate being attorneys. Each week, they discuss current Supreme Court cases with the intent to make the law more accessible to the average person, while ruminating on what makes the law both frustrating and interesting. This podcast is not legal advice and is for entertainment purposes only. If anything you hear leads you to believe you need legal advice, please contact an attorney immediately
…
continue reading
Supreme Court Season episodes will include all arguments that occur from October 01st to June/July.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Audio from oral arguments in the Supreme Court of the United States (beg. Oct. 2010)
…
continue reading
In depth explanations of Supreme Court Cases New Jersey v T.L.O, Mapp v Ohio, and Miranda v Arizona.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
A podcast feed for the audio of Supreme Court oral arguments and decision announcements. Short case descriptions are reproduced from Oyez.org under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license. This feed is not approved, managed, or affiliated with Oyez.org. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
…
continue reading
We will dive into the astounding stories of the Supreme Court.
…
continue reading
Opinion announcements from the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
A chronological podcast of oral arguments with improved files and meta data. Hosted by Free Law Project through the CourtListener.com initiative. Not an official podcast.
…
continue reading
The Queens Supreme Court podcast is the hilarious spinoff of the hit online series “The Queens Supreme Court” with Ts Madison. The premise of the weekly satirical show is to discuss pop culture and all the hot social media trends, topics and gossip THEN try them as cases, render judgements and sentence the crimes accordingly to determine the ultimate fate of each celebrity!
…
continue reading
Podcast by Hemant Mehta
…
continue reading
Any listeners out there...really want entertaining basketball content? Don't want to worry about the hosts - all on the show trying to force "controversial" hot takes, all in your earbuds, yelling back and forth to win an argument? Come to The Supreme Court: A Basketball Podcast! Check back with the SC trio; Robaire, Chris, and Henri, Wednesdays as we discuss the latest NBA headlines, news, and transactions.
…
continue reading
Throughout the years the Supreme Court has evolved much like the rest of the federal government. This would not be without landmark rulings, which will be the main focus of this podcast. Landmark rulings lay the groundwork for laws to be overturned or upheld and allow for the United States to work toward major goals. Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/aaron-larson2/support
…
continue reading
This study, A Christian Response to the Supreme Court Decision, exposes the foreboding Danger that this ruling will bring upon our nation if things don’t turn around very quickly. You will also be thoroughly equipped to give a loving Biblical apologetic response to 15 different accusations made against Christians regarding this issue.
…
continue reading
![Artwork](/static/images/128pixel.png)
1
FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine
11:10
11:10
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
11:10
FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine In 2000, the Food and Drug Administration approved a new drug application for mifepristone tablets marketed under the brand name Mifeprex for use in terminating pregnancies up to seven weeks. To help ensure that Mifeprex would be used safely and effectively, FDA placed additional restrictions on the drug’s u…
…
continue reading
![Artwork](/static/images/128pixel.png)
1
Abortion & Guns (Civ Pro & Statutory Interpretation)
49:59
49:59
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
49:59
This week's episode covers the cases of FDA v. Doctor's for Hippocratic Medicine and Cargill v. Garland, which deal with big legal issues in small legal ways. The podcast starts by also discussing Big Sam Alito's recently foibles with judicial ethics and ends with a discussion on dance recital season. The law basically starts from the beginning if …
…
continue reading
![Artwork](/static/images/128pixel.png)
1
Conservative Supreme Court majority strikes down ban on bump stocks
6:00
6:00
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
6:00
The Supreme Court handed down a ruling with major implications for firearm regulations. In a 6-3 decision, the conservative majority found that the government exceeded its authority when it banned bump stocks. The gun accessory allows users to re-engage the trigger continuously, dramatically increasing the rate of fire. Amna Nawaz discussed more wi…
…
continue reading
![Artwork](/static/images/128pixel.png)
1
Emanuel Lozada v. His Majesty the King (40701)
1:16:09
1:16:09
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:16:09
(Publication ban in case) The appellant, Emanuel Lozada, along with other individuals, participated in two fights, the second of which resulted in the fatal stabbing of the victim. At the appellant’s trial for manslaughter, the Crown argued that the appellant was liable for manslaughter either as a co-principal with the man alleged to have stabbed …
…
continue reading
![Artwork](/static/images/128pixel.png)
1
Starbucks Corp. v. McKinney (NLRB / Labor)
6:59
6:59
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
6:59
After several Starbucks employees announced plans to unionize, they invited a news crew from a local television station to visit the store after hours to promote their unionizing effort. Starbucks fired multiple employees involved with the media event for violating company policy. The National Labor Relations Board filed an administrative complaint…
…
continue reading
![Artwork](/static/images/128pixel.png)
1
Vidal v. Elster (First Amendment / Trademark)
11:06
11:06
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
11:06
Drawing on a 2016 Presidential primary debate exchange between thencandidate Donald Trump and Senator Marco Rubio, respondent Steve Elster sought to federally register the trademark “Trump too small” to use on shirts and hats. An examiner from the Patent and Trademark Office refused registration based on the “names clause,” a Lanham Act prohibition…
…
continue reading
![Artwork](/static/images/128pixel.png)
1
Truck Insurance Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum (Bankruptcy)
8:23
8:23
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
8:23
Petitioner Truck Insurance Exchange is the primary insurer for companies that manufactured and sold products containing asbestos. Two of those companies, Kaiser Gypsum Co. and Hanson Permanente Cement (Debtors), filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy after facing thousands of asbestos-related lawsuits. As part of the bankruptcy process, the Debtors filed …
…
continue reading
![Artwork](/static/images/128pixel.png)
1
Becerra v. San Carlos Apache Tribe
12:33
12:33
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
12:33
The Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, 25 U. S. C. §5301 et seq., enables an Indian tribe to enter into a “self-determination contract” with the Indian Health Service to assume responsibility for administering the healthcare programs that IHS would otherwise operate for the tribe. §5321(a)(1). When IHS administers such programs…
…
continue reading
Connelly v. United States Michael and Thomas Connelly were the sole shareholders in Crown C Supply, a small building supply corporation. The brothers entered into an agreement to ensure that Crown would stay in the family if either brother died. Under that agreement, the surviving brother would have the option to purchase the deceased brother’s sha…
…
continue reading
![Artwork](/static/images/128pixel.png)
1
Access to mifepristone remains unchanged as Supreme Court rejects abortion pill challenge
3:00
3:00
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
3:00
In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court ruled that a group of anti-abortion doctors does not have any legal basis to challenge access to mifepristone, one of the two common drugs used in medication abortion. As a result, access to mifepristone will not change. John Yang reports. PBS NewsHour is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/f…
…
continue reading
![Artwork](/static/images/128pixel.png)
1
Cantero v. Bank of America (Banking)
9:08
9:08
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
9:08
In Cantero v. Bank of America, the Supreme Court reviewed a Second Circuit decision that struck down a New York bank regulation, finding that the State's authority was preempted by federal law. The Court held that Dodd-Frank requires a nuanced analysis -- rather than a bright line test -- on the issue of federal preemption. Justice Kavanaugh, writi…
…
continue reading
![Artwork](/static/images/128pixel.png)
1
Former neighbor disputes Alito's explanation of upside-down U.S. flag flying at his home
5:08
5:08
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
5:08
A former neighbor of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito said, "at worst, he's just outright lying," about his account of a neighborhood dispute that led to hoisting an upside-down American flag at his Virginia home. The inverted flag is associated with the effort to overturn President Biden's 2020 election win. Lisa Desjardins reports. PBS NewsHour…
…
continue reading
![Artwork](/static/images/128pixel.png)
1
NRA v. Vullo (First Amendment)
11:18
11:18
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
11:18
Petitioner National Rifle Association (NRA) sued respondent Maria Vullo—former superintendent of the New York Department of Financial Services (DFS)—alleging that Vullo violated the First Amendment by coercing DFS-regulated parties to punish or suppress the NRA’s gun-promotion advocacy. The Second Circuit held that Vullo’s alleged actions constitut…
…
continue reading
![Artwork](/static/images/128pixel.png)
1
Thornell v. Jones (Ineffective Assistance)
11:26
11:26
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
11:26
Thornell v. Jones Respondent Danny Lee Jones was convicted of the premeditated firstdegree murders of Robert and Tisha Weaver and the attempted premeditated murder of Robert’s grandmother Katherine Gumina. Arizona law at the time required the trial court to “impose a sentence of death” if it found “one or more” statutorily enumerated “aggravating c…
…
continue reading
Coinbase v. Suski The dispute here involves a conflict between two contracts executed by petitioner Coinbase, Inc., operator of a cryptocurrency exchange platform, and respondents, who use Coinbase. The first contract—the Coinbase User Agreement that respondents agreed to when they created their accounts—contains an arbitration provision with a del…
…
continue reading
![Artwork](/static/images/128pixel.png)
1
Brown v. United States (Criminal)
12:01
12:01
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
12:01
These cases concern the application of the Armed Career Criminal Act to state drug convictions that occurred before recent technical amendments to the federal drug schedules. ACCA imposes a 15-year mandatory minimum sentence on defendants who are convicted for the illegal possession of a firearm and who have a criminal history thought to demonstrat…
…
continue reading
![Artwork](/static/images/128pixel.png)
1
Alexander v. NAACP (Redistricting / Gerrymandering)
13:07
13:07
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
13:07
Alexander v. NAACP The Constitution entrusts state legislatures with the primary responsibility for drawing congressional districts, and legislative redistricting is an inescapably political enterprise. Claims that a map is unconstitutional because it was drawn to achieve a partisan end are not justiciable in federal court. By contrast, if a legisl…
…
continue reading
![Artwork](/static/images/128pixel.png)
1
His Majesty the King v. Agénor Archambault, et al. (40428)
2:41:05
2:41:05
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
2:41:05
(Publication ban in case) In July 2019, in two separate cases, the respondents appeared in the Court of Québec to answer charges for indictable offences that were punishable by a maximum of 14 years of imprisonment, but that had been punishable by a maximum of 10 years of imprisonment at the time they were allegedly committed. The respondents were …
…
continue reading
![Artwork](/static/images/128pixel.png)
1
Alito says he won't recuse himself from election and Jan. 6 cases after flag controversies
7:34
7:34
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
7:34
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito told lawmakers he won't recuse himself from cases involving the 2020 presidential election or the Jan. 6 Capitol riot despite concerns about two flags associated with far-right causes that have flown over his properties. Alito said his wife, Martha-Ann Alito, was responsible for flying the flags. Geoff Bennett dis…
…
continue reading
![Artwork](/static/images/128pixel.png)
1
Sanis Health Inc., et al. v. His Majesty the King in Right of the Province of British Columbia (Day 2/2) (40864)
1:22:01
1:22:01
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:22:01
In 2018, the Province of British Columbia (hereafter, “BC”) enacted the Opioid Damages and Health Care Costs Recovery Act (the “ORA”). The ORA allows BC to recover health care costs caused or contributed to by “opioid-related wrongs” committed by manufacturers and distributors of opioid drugs. Section 11 of the ORA applies to proceedings relating t…
…
continue reading
![Artwork](/static/images/128pixel.png)
1
Sanis Health Inc., et al. v. His Majesty the King in Right of the Province of British Columbia (Day 1/2) (40864)
2:00:10
2:00:10
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
2:00:10
In 2018, the Province of British Columbia (hereafter, “BC”) enacted the Opioid Damages and Health Care Costs Recovery Act (the “ORA”). The ORA allows BC to recover health care costs caused or contributed to by “opioid-related wrongs” committed by manufacturers and distributors of opioid drugs. Section 11 of the ORA applies to proceedings relating t…
…
continue reading
![Artwork](/static/images/128pixel.png)
1
Harrow v. Department of Defense (Equitable Tolling / Jurisdictional Deadlines)
5:36
5:36
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
5:36
In Harrow v. Department of Defense, Stuart Harrow appealed an adverse administrative decision after the 60-day deadline -- claiming that he was unaware of the deadline. He filed this appeal to the Federal Circuit. Because the Federal Circuit saw the mandatory "shall" language in the statute (that is, it shall be filed within 60 days), the Court den…
…
continue reading
Smith v. Spizzirri The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) sets forth procedures for enforcing arbitration agreements in federal court. Section 3 of the FAA, entitled “Stay of proceedings where issue therein referable to arbitration,” provides that when a dispute is subject to arbitration, the court “shall on application of one of the parties stay the tr…
…
continue reading
![Artwork](/static/images/128pixel.png)
1
Supreme Court rejects racial gerrymandering claim in South Carolina
5:28
5:28
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
5:28
The Supreme Court struck down a challenge to a congressional map in South Carolina that civil rights groups argued was a racial gerrymander. In a 6-3 decision, the conservative majority delivered a win to Republicans who said they used politics, not race, as the key factor when drawing the district bounds. Geoff Bennett discussed the decision with …
…
continue reading
![Artwork](/static/images/128pixel.png)
1
Flag associated with Christian nationalism flown at Alito's beach house, report says
6:45
6:45
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
6:45
The New York Times reports that an "Appeal to Heaven" flag, which has origins dating to the Revolutionary War but is now associated with Christian nationalism and efforts to overturn President Biden's election win, was seen flying outside Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito's New Jersey beach home last year. White House Correspondent Laura Barrón-Ló…
…
continue reading
![Artwork](/static/images/128pixel.png)
1
Attorney General of Ontario v. Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc., et al. (Day 2/2) (40725)
1:37:20
1:37:20
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
1:37:20
This case concerns the third party spending limits most recently added to the Election Finances Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. E.7 (“EFA”), in 2021, and whether they infringe the informational component of the right to vote (i.e., a citizen’s right to exercise their vote in an informed manner), which is protected by s. 3 of the Charter. The amendments to the…
…
continue reading
![Artwork](/static/images/128pixel.png)
1
Attorney General of Ontario v. Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc., et al. (Day 1/2) (40725)
2:05:56
2:05:56
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
2:05:56
This case concerns the third party spending limits most recently added to the Election Finances Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. E.7 (“EFA”), in 2021, and whether they infringe the informational component of the right to vote (i.e., a citizen’s right to exercise their vote in an informed manner), which is protected by s. 3 of the Charter. The amendments to the…
…
continue reading
![Artwork](/static/images/128pixel.png)
1
How the reversal of Roe v. Wade reshaped American life
6:41
6:41
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
6:41
It's been nearly two years since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade and eliminated the federal right to abortion. Shefali Luthra, a health reporter at The 19th News, spoke to a variety of Americans about how their lives have been upended by the court's decision for her book, "Undue Burden: Life and Death Decisions in Post-Roe America." She jo…
…
continue reading
![Artwork](/static/images/128pixel.png)
1
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial
10:12
10:12
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
10:12
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU ET AL. v. COMMUNITY FINANCIAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, LTD., ET AL. The Constitution gives Congress control over the public fisc subject to the command that “[n]o Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law.” Art. I, §9, cl. 7. For most federal agencies, Congr…
…
continue reading
![Artwork](/static/images/128pixel.png)
1
Culley v. Marshall (Asset Forfeiture)
8:35
8:35
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
8:35
Culley v. Marshall Petitioner Halima Culley loaned her car to her son, who was later pulled over by Alabama police officers and arrested for possession of marijuana. Petitioner Lena Sutton loaned her car to a friend, who was stopped by Alabama police and arrested for trafficking methamphetamine. In both cases, petitioners’ cars were seized under an…
…
continue reading
![Artwork](/static/images/128pixel.png)
1
Warner Chappell Music v. Nealy (Copyright)
4:29
4:29
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
4:29
Warner Chappell Music v. Nealy Under the Copyright Act, a plaintiff must file suit “within three years after the claim accrued.” 17 U. S. C. §507(b). On one understanding of that limitations provision, a copyright claim “accrue[s]” when “an infringing act occurs.” Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., 572 U. S. 663, 670. But under an alternative v…
…
continue reading
![Artwork](/static/images/128pixel.png)
1
Analyzing the consequential Supreme Court term and its ideological divide
7:58
7:58
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
7:58
The Supreme Court wrapped up oral arguments and has now turned to rolling out decisions in some of the most consequential cases of the year. Those decisions will shape policies nationwide on divisive issues like homelessness and reproductive rights, and some of them could affect the presidential election. John Yang discussed more with NewsHour Supr…
…
continue reading
This week's episode once again covers former President Donald Trump's cases before the Supreme Court, dealing mostly with Trump v. U.S. (whether a President has absolute immunity for criminal actions), but also covering Fischer v. U.S. (whether a statute meant to resolve evidence tampering can also be applied against January 6th Defendants). Brett …
…
continue reading
![Artwork](/static/images/128pixel.png)
1
Muldrow v. St. Louis (Employment Discrimination)
8:19
8:19
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
8:19
Muldrow v. City of St. Louis Sergeant Jatonya Clayborn Muldrow maintains that her employer, the St. Louis Police Department, transferred her from one job to another because she is a woman. From 2008 through 2017, Muldrow worked as a plainclothes officer in the Department’s specialized Intelligence Division. In 2017, the new Intelligence Division co…
…
continue reading
![Artwork](/static/images/128pixel.png)
1
Trump v. U.S., No. 23-939 [Arg: 4.25.2024]
2:39:18
2:39:18
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
2:39:18
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether and if so to what extent does a former president enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★De către Austin Songer
…
continue reading
![Artwork](/static/images/128pixel.png)
1
Analyzing the Supreme Court hearing on Trump's presidential immunity claim
9:25
9:25
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
9:25
The Supreme Court heard debate over one of its most consequential cases, whether a former president is immune from prosecution for actions taken while in office. Arguments were heard on an appeal brought by Donald Trump, who's being prosecuted for attempting to overthrow the results of the 2020 election. John Yang discussed more with William Brangh…
…
continue reading
![Artwork](/static/images/128pixel.png)
1
TransAlta Generation Partnership, et al. v. His Majesty the King in Right of the Province of Alberta, et al. (40570)
3:23:42
3:23:42
Redă mai târziu
Redă mai târziu
Liste
Like
Plăcut
3:23:42
Appellants TransAlta Generation Partnership and TransAlta Generation (Keephills 3) (collectively, “TransAlta”) own coal-fired electrical power generation facilities in Alberta. The value of those properties is assessed as “linear property” for municipal taxation purposes. The Municipal Government Act, R.S.A. 2000, c. M-26, defines the term “linear …
…
continue reading
A case in which the Court will decide whether, and if so to what extent, a former president enjoys presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office.
…
continue reading
Trump v. United StatesDe către Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading