Artwork

Content provided by Kelley Vlahos and Daniel Larison, Kelley Vlahos, and Daniel Larison. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Kelley Vlahos and Daniel Larison, Kelley Vlahos, and Daniel Larison or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ro.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Aplicație Podcast
Treceți offline cu aplicația Player FM !

Michael Swaine warns against 'radical deterrence' in US-China policy

47:48
 
Distribuie
 

Manage episode 377670485 series 2920514
Content provided by Kelley Vlahos and Daniel Larison, Kelley Vlahos, and Daniel Larison. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Kelley Vlahos and Daniel Larison, Kelley Vlahos, and Daniel Larison or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ro.player.fm/legal.

Ask anyone in Washington and they'll tell you, in varying levels of panic, that China is a threat to the United States. Some will say it's the greatest threat ever or, in military-speak, the "pacing threat." So who is right? And if China is a challenge or even a threat, to its neighbors if not America directly, then how does the Biden Administration rationally deal with that?

We asked longtime China security studies expert Michael Swaine to join us this week to talk about current U.S. policy and whether or not it is going in the wrong direction. He tells us that the saber-rattling on both sides of the political aisle is risking a "radical deterrence" effect — in other words, there is a way to do positive deterrence that avoids war, not "radical deterrence," which drives you closer to real conflict.

In the first segment, Kelley and Dan hash out their favorite headlines of the week, including Zelensky's visit to Washington, Biden's signing of defense security assurances for Bahrain (and possibly for Saudi soon, too), and Canadian accusations that the Indian government is linked to the assassination of a Sikh independence activist in British Columbia in June.

More from Michael Swaine:

How to Break the Impasse in U.S.-China Crisis Communication, United States Institute of Peace,7/26/23

A Restraint Approach to U.S.–China Relations: Reversing the Slide Toward Crisis and Conflict, with Andrew Bacevich, the Quincy Institute, 4/18/23

The Worrisome Erosion of the One China Policy, The National Interest, 2/27/23

A Restraint Recipe for America’s Asian Alliances and Security Partnerships, with Sarang Shidore, Quincy Institute, 11/18/22


This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit crashingthewarparty.substack.com
  continue reading

124 episoade

Artwork
iconDistribuie
 
Manage episode 377670485 series 2920514
Content provided by Kelley Vlahos and Daniel Larison, Kelley Vlahos, and Daniel Larison. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Kelley Vlahos and Daniel Larison, Kelley Vlahos, and Daniel Larison or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ro.player.fm/legal.

Ask anyone in Washington and they'll tell you, in varying levels of panic, that China is a threat to the United States. Some will say it's the greatest threat ever or, in military-speak, the "pacing threat." So who is right? And if China is a challenge or even a threat, to its neighbors if not America directly, then how does the Biden Administration rationally deal with that?

We asked longtime China security studies expert Michael Swaine to join us this week to talk about current U.S. policy and whether or not it is going in the wrong direction. He tells us that the saber-rattling on both sides of the political aisle is risking a "radical deterrence" effect — in other words, there is a way to do positive deterrence that avoids war, not "radical deterrence," which drives you closer to real conflict.

In the first segment, Kelley and Dan hash out their favorite headlines of the week, including Zelensky's visit to Washington, Biden's signing of defense security assurances for Bahrain (and possibly for Saudi soon, too), and Canadian accusations that the Indian government is linked to the assassination of a Sikh independence activist in British Columbia in June.

More from Michael Swaine:

How to Break the Impasse in U.S.-China Crisis Communication, United States Institute of Peace,7/26/23

A Restraint Approach to U.S.–China Relations: Reversing the Slide Toward Crisis and Conflict, with Andrew Bacevich, the Quincy Institute, 4/18/23

The Worrisome Erosion of the One China Policy, The National Interest, 2/27/23

A Restraint Recipe for America’s Asian Alliances and Security Partnerships, with Sarang Shidore, Quincy Institute, 11/18/22


This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit crashingthewarparty.substack.com
  continue reading

124 episoade

ทุกตอน

×
 
Loading …

Bun venit la Player FM!

Player FM scanează web-ul pentru podcast-uri de înaltă calitate pentru a vă putea bucura acum. Este cea mai bună aplicație pentru podcast și funcționează pe Android, iPhone și pe web. Înscrieți-vă pentru a sincroniza abonamentele pe toate dispozitivele.

 

Ghid rapid de referință