E6S-012RB Yield to Defects (Rebroadcast) - Project Metrics – Measure the right stuff- Part 2

E6S-Methods Lean Six Sigma Performance Podcast with Aaron Spearin & Jacob Kurian

Like / Dislike **We'd Appreciate Your Opinion**

Email me: [e-mail]

Leave a Review! http://bit.ly/E6S-iTunes;

Donations: http://bit.ly/E6S-Donate

Intro: Welcome to the E6S-Methods podcast with Jacob and Aaron, your weekly dose of tips and tricks to achieve excellent performance in your business and career. Join us as we explore deeper into the practical worlds of Lean, Six Sigma, Project Management and Design Thinking. . In this episode number 12 (Part 2 of 4), we unwrap the mystery of choosing project metrics. We uncover the hidden waste within common business metrics, from yield to defects, and the challenges with introducing more accurate Six Sigma metrics. If you're just tuning in for the first time, find all our back episodes on our podcast table of contents at e6s-methods.com. If you like this episode, be sure to click the "like" link in the show notes. It's easy. Just tap our logo, click and you're done. Tap-click-done! Here we go. http://bit.ly/E6S-012RB Leave a Review! http://bit.ly/E6S-iTunes

I First Pass Yield (FPY) vs. (RTY) Rolled-Throughput Yield

a. Terms

i. First Pass Yield (FPY)- common business metric, (aka Final Test Yield, or First Time Good)

1. FPY= (#Processed-#Defective/(#Processed) * 100%

ii. In-Process Yield (IPY) – First Pass Yield for the Individual Process Step (fairly common)

1. IPYn=(#Processed - #Defective)/#Processed*100%

iii. Rolled Throughput Yield (not-so-common) – The probability a part or transaction will move from beginning to end error-free.

1. approximated by = IPY1*IPY2*IPY3*IPY4*.....IPYn

2. More accurately measured by RTY= e^(-DPU)

II Defective Rate

a. Defective – A unit that contains at least one defect (i.e. a defective part)

b. Defect – An output of a process that does not meet a defined specification - Must be Measurable!

i. Relationship #Defects >/= #Defectives

ii. Nicks, Dents, Scratch, Width out of Tolerance, Incorrect information, etc.

c. Defects Per Unit (DPU)– Average number of defects on a single unit or part

i. Example: One “Defective” part has a dent, and scratch, and missing hardware. This is 3 Defects on one unit. DPU=3.

III First Pass Yield (FPY) vs. (RTY) Rolled-Throughput Yield (continued)

a. RTY tells the whole story that FPY misses, a more honest operations business metric.

b. RTY takes into account rework and the “hidden factory”, not just Scrap.

c. RTY

d. Examples

i. 5-step process with rework

ii. Batch Chemical Manufacturing with Rework

e. Challenges of RTY

i. First Pass Yield is the long-standing incumbent standard

ii. Math more difficult and not easily proven as valid without greater familiarity with statistics

iii. In-Process Yields may not be captured

iv. Defects per Unit are often not captured. Most pieces are rejected after the first defect is spotted, and no more time is spent on the pieces.

IV Other defect measures: DPPM vs. DPMO

a. DPPM - Defective Parts Per Million- Count of defective parts per 1 million parts produced. One defective part may have multiple defects, but only counts once.

b. DPMO – Defects Per Million Opportunities – Count of total defects per million opportunities to create a defect.

i. Benefits: More precise DMAIC project metric. Analysis can allow honing in on a key process step or specific opportunity associated with a high defect rate.

ii. Challenges: Defining what constitutes an “opportunity” can be difficult, and not universally recognized.

V Final Note: DMAIC projects should focus on eliminating individual defects. As such, DPU and DPMO make better DMAIC project metrics. This allows the project to scope down and focus on the key defects. The reality of DMAIC projects is that the number of defects can be reduced without actually decreasing the count of defective parts. Project success may not register an impact on business metrics. If DPU is not well measured at the start, the most obvious defects can be replaced by other defects that were previously undocumented. A sampling plan may be necessary in these cases at the start of a project to capture these data.

VI *** Measure the right stuff***

Outro: Thanks for listening to episode 12 of the E6S-Methods Podcast. Stay tuned for episode number 13, (Part 3 of 4). “Lag or Lead”. We discuss the differences in and examples of Lagging vs. Leading metrics, and which are best suited for projects. Don't forget to click "like" or "dislike" for this episode in the show notes. Tap-click-done! If you have a question, comment or advice, leave a note in the comments section or contact us directly. Feel free to email me "Aaron," [e-mail], or on our website, we reply to all messages. If you heard something you like, then Clammr, and share it. Didn't like what you heard? Join our LinkedIn Group, and tell us why. Don't forget you can find notes and graphics for all shows and more at www.E6S-Methods.com. "Journey Through Success. If you're not climbing up, you're falling down." Leave a Review! http://bit.ly/E6S-iTunes

Like / Dislike **We'd Appreciate Your Opinion**