))
(Short) Owen's Spicy Take on Hallucinations and Libby's Strong Disagree
Manage episode 398367589 series 3513246
Content provided by Owen Henkel & Libby Hills, Owen Henkel, and Libby Hills. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Owen Henkel & Libby Hills, Owen Henkel, and Libby Hills or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ro.player.fm/legal.
This week, we're trying something a bit different and doing a short episode. The gloves come off as Libby and Owen engage in a lively debate about the "hallucinations" in large language models (e.g. unexpected and hard to explain errors) and their impact on building educational products.
They spar on the nuances of model hallucinations, discussing the various forms and potential consequences. Owen presents a "spicy take" on the matter, advocating for the value of engagement and interaction even if it means accepting a certain level of inaccuracy.
Libby, however, expresses concerns about the accuracy of information in educational settings, particularly in K-12 schools. She emphasizes the importance of the high bar set by traditional educational tools in terms of factual correctness.
Who scores an ed-technical knockout? You, the listeners, will decide!
Join us on social media:
- BOLD (@BOLD_insights), Libby Hills (@Libbylhhills) and Owen Henkel (@owen_henkel)
- Listen to all episodes of Ed-Technical here: https://bold.expert/ed-technical
- Subscribe to BOLD’s newsletter: https://bold.expert/newsletter
- Stay up to date with all the latest research on child development and learning: https://bold.expert
Credits: Sarah Myles for production support; Josie Hills for graphic design
13 episoade
Distribuie
