Artwork

Content provided by UACES Podcasts and UACES: the association for European Studies. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by UACES Podcasts and UACES: the association for European Studies or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ro.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Aplicație Podcast
Treceți offline cu aplicația Player FM !

EU Foreign Policy 10 Years after Lisbon | Tony Van Der Togt

14:21
 
Distribuie
 

Manage episode 228136868 series 2287533
Content provided by UACES Podcasts and UACES: the association for European Studies. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by UACES Podcasts and UACES: the association for European Studies or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ro.player.fm/legal.
Recorded at the "Perspectives on European Foreign Policy in the Context of Current EU-Russia Relations" Workshop - Friday 11 January 2019 - Leiden University, Netherlands * * * Tony van der Togt Tony van der Togt compares his experience with foreign policy making in the early 2000s with what the EU is capable to do now, and his reflections focus on three observations: 1. There is increasing soul-searching happening in many European capitals and beyond to the questions “Are we [Europeans] increasingly an exception”? but also “is the US still a partner”? The liberal rules-based order is indeed under threat and challenged from different sides, and many partners also wonder if the US is still a partner. What is “new” for the EU in all of this, is that for a long time Europeans could take it for granted that the others would automatically follow our example. The “EU was like the city on the hill”. This is now gone. The idea of a value-based foreign policy is increasingly challenged. 2. In principle, the EU is now much better equipped nowadays and institutionally organised. The EU can be more coordinated and more strategic. 3. But in practice, it is more complicated when one looks at the commitment of member states. To take the EU-Russia relations, there was at least a strategy in 2000. It was difficult to get all member states on board and it was a very general statement, but we had at least a common stance. And keeping this “unity in purpose, and unity in action” is now more difficult for the EU, also because the commitment of member states was guaranteed during the rotating presidency in foreign policy, and that we lost. * * * Note: UACES does not take responsibility for opinions expressed in this recording. All opinions are those of the contributors.
  continue reading

49 episoade

Artwork
iconDistribuie
 
Manage episode 228136868 series 2287533
Content provided by UACES Podcasts and UACES: the association for European Studies. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by UACES Podcasts and UACES: the association for European Studies or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://ro.player.fm/legal.
Recorded at the "Perspectives on European Foreign Policy in the Context of Current EU-Russia Relations" Workshop - Friday 11 January 2019 - Leiden University, Netherlands * * * Tony van der Togt Tony van der Togt compares his experience with foreign policy making in the early 2000s with what the EU is capable to do now, and his reflections focus on three observations: 1. There is increasing soul-searching happening in many European capitals and beyond to the questions “Are we [Europeans] increasingly an exception”? but also “is the US still a partner”? The liberal rules-based order is indeed under threat and challenged from different sides, and many partners also wonder if the US is still a partner. What is “new” for the EU in all of this, is that for a long time Europeans could take it for granted that the others would automatically follow our example. The “EU was like the city on the hill”. This is now gone. The idea of a value-based foreign policy is increasingly challenged. 2. In principle, the EU is now much better equipped nowadays and institutionally organised. The EU can be more coordinated and more strategic. 3. But in practice, it is more complicated when one looks at the commitment of member states. To take the EU-Russia relations, there was at least a strategy in 2000. It was difficult to get all member states on board and it was a very general statement, but we had at least a common stance. And keeping this “unity in purpose, and unity in action” is now more difficult for the EU, also because the commitment of member states was guaranteed during the rotating presidency in foreign policy, and that we lost. * * * Note: UACES does not take responsibility for opinions expressed in this recording. All opinions are those of the contributors.
  continue reading

49 episoade

Toate episoadele

×
 
Loading …

Bun venit la Player FM!

Player FM scanează web-ul pentru podcast-uri de înaltă calitate pentru a vă putea bucura acum. Este cea mai bună aplicație pentru podcast și funcționează pe Android, iPhone și pe web. Înscrieți-vă pentru a sincroniza abonamentele pe toate dispozitivele.

 

Ghid rapid de referință